RE: Testing octave-4.0.1-rc4

[JohnD]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John W. Eaton [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 10:38 AM
> To: JohnD; address@hidden
> Subject: Re: Testing octave-4.0.1-rc4
> 
> On 03/11/2016 07:13 AM, JohnD wrote:
> >>
> >> Message: 7
> >> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 20:24:13 -0800
> >> From: Rik <address@hidden>
> >> To: Octave-Maintainers <address@hidden>,   "John W.
> Eaton"
> >>    <address@hidden>
> >> Subject: Testing octave-4.0.1-rc4
> >> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> >>
> >> jwe,
> >>
> >> I tested the new tarball at ftp://alpha.gnu.org.  As expected for a
> > vanilla
> >> Linux system, it passed all tests and all build configurations
> >> including in-tree, out-of-tree builds, and 'make install' followed by
> > __run_test_suite__.
> >>
> >> --Rik
> >
> >
> > Compiling in mxe-octave with new tarball and running win7:
> >
> >    PASS     13020
> >    FAIL         0
> >    XFAIL       27
> >    SKIPPED     54
> 
> I see almost the same result but I have 26 XFAIL and 13021 PASS.  Here are
my
> XFAIL counts:
> 
>    libinterp\corefcn\conv2.cc-tst   XFAIL   3
>    libinterp\corefcn\max.cc-tst     XFAIL   3
>    general\num2str.m                XFAIL   1
>    polynomial\residue.m             XFAIL   1
>    testfun\speed.m                  XFAIL   1
>    testfun\test.m                   XFAIL   1
>    bug-38236.tst                    XFAIL   1
>    classdef.tst                     XFAIL   2
>    classes.tst                      XFAIL  11
>    jit.tst                          XFAIL   2
> 
> Which one(s) are different for you?
> 
> Also, it's very nice to see that the packages are all cross compiled and
installed
> by the installer now!
> 
> Uploading the nsis installer and the zip file distribution of the Windows
binary to
> alpha.gnu.org now.
> 
> jwe
> 

I also had:

miscellaneous\zip.m XFAIL 1      -- zip file cannot be found!