[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: regarding GSoC 2016 proposal.
|
From: |
Juan Pablo Carbajal |
|
Subject: |
Re: regarding GSoC 2016 proposal. |
|
Date: |
Thu, 24 Mar 2016 12:34:36 +0100 |
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:00 AM, Neeraj Battan
<address@hidden> wrote:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j3o_OGxoRxbhAZF_JUzzVp2ke3WAoffuCeewJxrPGTk/edit#
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Neeraj Battan" <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 7:30:07 AM
> Subject: regarding GSoC 2016 proposal.
>
> KaKila: Hi, this is my GSoC proposal for the project "TISEAN package". Can
> you review it and tell me some modifications in it which are needed.
>
Hi,
It looks good. Please have in mind the follwing.
. This year there are plenty of applications to improve "core"
therefore octave forge packages might not be as relevant if we are
short of slots.
. The randomize functions are not trivial and 3 days wont be enough.
Good luck!