Re: regarding GSoC 2016

[Carnë Draug]

On 25 March 2016 at 07:57, PhilipNienhuis <address@hidden> wrote:
> Carnë Draug wrote
>> On 24 March 2016 at 12:05, Juan Pablo Carbajal &lt;
>
>> ajuanpi+dev@
>
>> &gt; wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Neeraj Battan
>>> &lt;
>
>> address@hidden
>
>> &gt; wrote:
>>>> KaKila: Hi, thanks for having a look at my proposal. Can you please tell
>>>> me which are the core projects?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Everything that doesn't say "Package" is most likely core. Exception
>>> is in "Infracstructure" the package manager.
>>> With your profile I would also consider that project.
>>>
>>
>> The projects page should be cleared up then.  The logical operations on
>> polygons are listed under missing core functions but would actually go
>> into the mapping package.
>
> IMO they better fit in the geometry package. That already contains several
> functions that operate on polygons.
> Until recently oc_polybool() actually was in there, it was removed (as
> JuanPi told me) because its author wanted so (it's now in octclip).
>
> Philip

The functions proposed on the projects page are polybool, ispolycw, poly2ccw,
poly2cw, poly2fv, polyjoin, and polysplit.  They all belong to the Matlab
mapping toolbox therefore would go into the Octave mapping package.

Carnë