[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: optim, struct, parallel: pre-release check on Windows?
From: |
Olaf Till |
Subject: |
Re: optim, struct, parallel: pre-release check on Windows? |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:00:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 07:15:22PM +0200, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> On 30/03/2016 21:30, Olaf Till wrote:
> >I'd like to request a release for packages 'optim', 'struct', and
> >'parallel' in the next days.
> >
> >If any of these packages should be planned to be cross-built for
> >Windows, it would be nice if this would be tested _before_ the
> >release. The known bugs in this context are supposed to be fixed.
> >
> >('parallel', optionally used by 'optim', is also supposed to be
> >buildable on Windows, with configure switch --disable-cluster.)
> >
> >Olaf
> >
>
> Hi Olaf,
> are you referring for parallel to a 3.0.5 version ?
Yes, that what should become version 3.0.5
> The current 3.0.4 on cygwin does not build completely,
>
> $ ls *oct
> __exit__.oct fload.oct fsave.oct
>
> Due to some issue with configure.
Yes, that was so.
> I tried with the latest repository and something breaks
> when building documentation:
>
> ./munge-texi.pl MFDOCSTRINGS pconnect.cc.docstrings pserver.cc.docstrings
> sclose.cc.docstrings reval.cc.docstrings precv.cc.docstrings
> psend.cc.docstrings select_sockets.cc.docstrings
> network_get_info.cc.docstrings network_set.cc.docstrings
> parallel_generate_srp_data.cc.docstrings fload.cc.docstrings
> fsave.cc.docstrings __exit__.cc.docstrings select.cc.docstrings
> __visglobal__.cc.docstrings < ../doc/parallel.txi > ../doc/parallel.texi
>
> invalid doc file format
>
> No clue which of the file is not recognized.
In a release, the documentation will be pre-built. But testing the
latest repository seems hindered by this issue ... Maybe you can, for
testing, just remove 'doc' from the line 'all: doc $(octs) $(ms)' in
'src/Makefile.in' ? Then the additional package documentation will not
be tried to be built. (Tracking down why building it doesn't work
would be a bit more work ...)
And, if you should succeed, you could test if parcellfun works with
something like:
octave:1> a = parcellfun (2, @ (x) x, num2cell (1:10))
parcellfun: 10/10 jobs done
a =
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Thanks,
Olaf
--
public key id EAFE0591, e.g. on x-hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: optim, struct, parallel: pre-release check on Windows?, Marco Atzeri, 2016/04/13
- Re: optim, struct, parallel: pre-release check on Windows?,
Olaf Till <=
- Re: optim, struct, parallel: pre-release check on Windows?, Marco Atzeri, 2016/04/15
- Re: optim, struct, parallel: pre-release check on Windows?, Olaf Till, 2016/04/15
- Re: optim, struct, parallel: pre-release check on Windows?, Mike Miller, 2016/04/15
- Re: optim, struct, parallel: pre-release check on Windows?, Olaf Till, 2016/04/16