[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
let's keep printf, puts, and scanf
From: |
Mike Miller |
Subject: |
let's keep printf, puts, and scanf |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:55:52 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
Kai,
Is there any particular reason you decided to deprecate printf, puts,
and scanf [1]? I think these are very useful Octave extensions that a
lot of users would miss, I know I will.
I think making them m-file wrappers around fprintf, fscanf, and fputs is
fine, but not marking them as deprecated.
Also the wrappers you created in scripts/deprecated do not work, they
are not using varargin correctly, see usage.m for an example.
[1]: http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/dcf8922b724b
--
mike
- let's keep printf, puts, and scanf,
Mike Miller <=
- Re: let's keep printf, puts, and scanf, John W. Eaton, 2016/04/20
- Re: let's keep printf, puts, and scanf, siko1056, 2016/04/20
- Re: let's keep printf, puts, and scanf, Mike Miller, 2016/04/21
- Re: let's keep printf, puts, and scanf, Kai Torben Ohlhus, 2016/04/21
- Re: let's keep printf, puts, and scanf, John W. Eaton, 2016/04/21
- Re: let's keep printf, puts, and scanf, edmund ronald, 2016/04/21