[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Socis 16 - Problem with pcg
|
From: |
Nicholas Jankowski |
|
Subject: |
Re: Socis 16 - Problem with pcg |
|
Date: |
Sun, 3 Jul 2016 08:05:16 -0400 |
On Jul 3, 2016 6:29 AM, "Cris" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> working on my Socis16 project, i had some problems with pcg when I test it with complex matrices.
> In the last post on my blog, that you can find here
> http://socis16octave-improveiterativemethods.blogspot.it/2016/07/pcg-analysis.html
> I explained all the details.
>
> Please give me some feedback / advices / suggestion or ask me if there is something not clear.
>
> Best regards,
> Cristiano Dorigo.
>
Curious, that complex comparison behavior is numerically consistent, right? I.e., is it how we expect other numerical systems, including but not limited to MATLAB, to handle a complex comparison query? My initial guess is yes, as I would consider a complex number a vector, and a simple comparison operator to deal with vector magnitude. So anything would look greater than zero. Are there other standard functions/methods for other ways of considering it?