octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: Lowering GraphicsMagick/ImageMagick Quantum depth warning


From: Carnë Draug
Subject: Re: Re: Lowering GraphicsMagick/ImageMagick Quantum depth warning
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 12:23:42 +0100

On 6 July 2016 at 06:04, Tatsuro MATSUOKA <address@hidden> wrote:
>> From: "tmacchant
>> To: John Donoghue ; Octave Maintainers List > Cc:
>> Date: 2016/3/30, Wed 20:12
>> Subject: Re: Re: Lowering GraphicsMagick/ImageMagick Quantum depth warning
>>
>> --- john.david.donoghue
>>>  On 03/30/2016 04:52 AM, tmacchant [viaOctave] wrote:
>>>  On octave for windows 4.0.1 built using mxe-octave.
>>>
>>>  >> test imfinfo verbose
>>>  :
>>>  :
>>>  :
>>>  warning: your version of GraphicsMagick limits images to 8 bitsper pixel
>>>
>>>  Looking into graphickmagick.mk, I cannot find to specify quantumdepth.
>>>  Therefore the warning the above appeared.
>>>
>>>  Why graphickmagick is not built with 16 bit quantum depth inmxe-octave?
>>>
>>>  Tatsuro
>>>
>>>  If you reply to this email, yourmessage will be added to the discussion
>> below:
>>>
>> http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Lowering-GraphicsMagick-ImageMagick-Quantum-depth-warning-tp4673547p4675987.htmlThis
>> email was sent by tmacchant(via Nabble)
>>>  To receive all replies by email, subscribeto this discussion
>>>
>>>  There is a bug report [1] about it, with patch - it had been decided not to
>> use it until after 4.0.1. Last time I tried it, it also caused random 
>> failures in
>> the tests
>>>
>>>
>>>  [1] https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=43505
>>>
>> I understand the situation.
>> It seems that there are complicated relationship to the Java.
>> I hope the issue will be solved in the near future.
>
>
>
> I found that GraphicsMagick is configured --with-quantum-depth=16 in current 
> mxe-octave.
>
> Is the problem solved?
>

Yes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?43505



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]