octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: Lowering GraphicsMagick/ImageMagick Quantum depth warning


From: address@hidden
Subject: Re: Re: Lowering GraphicsMagick/ImageMagick Quantum depth warning
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 06:25:16 +0900 (JST)


--- carandraug
> On 6 July 2016 at 06:04, Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
> >> From: "tmacchant
> >> To: John Donoghue ; Octave Maintainers List > Cc:
> >> Date: 2016/3/30, Wed 20:12
> >> Subject: Re: Re: Lowering GraphicsMagick/ImageMagick Quantum depth warning
> >>
> >> --- john.david.donoghue
> >>>  On 03/30/2016 04:52 AM, tmacchant [viaOctave] wrote:
> >>>  On octave for windows 4.0.1 built using mxe-octave.
> >>>
> >>>  >> test imfinfo verbose
> >>>  :
> >>>  :
> >>>  :
> >>>  warning: your version of GraphicsMagick limits images to 8 bitsper pixel
> >>>
> >>>  Looking into graphickmagick.mk, I cannot find to specify quantumdepth.
> >>>  Therefore the warning the above appeared.
> >>>
> >>>  Why graphickmagick is not built with 16 bit quantum depth inmxe-octave?
> >>>
> >>>  Tatsuro
> >>>
> >>>  If you reply to this email, yourmessage will be added to the discussion
> >> below:
> >>>
> >> http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Lowering-GraphicsMagick-ImageMagick-Quantum-depth-warning-tp4673547p4675987.htmlThis
> >> email was sent by tmacchant(via Nabble)
> >>>  To receive all replies by email, subscribeto this discussion
> >>>
> >>>  There is a bug report [1] about it, with patch - it had been decided not 
> >>> to
> >> use it until after 4.0.1. Last time I tried it, it also caused random 
> >> failures in
> >> the tests
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  [1] https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=43505
> >>>
> >> I understand the situation.
> >> It seems that there are complicated relationship to the Java.
> >> I hope the issue will be solved in the near future.
> >
> >
> >
> > I found that GraphicsMagick is configured --with-quantum-depth=16 in 
> > current mxe-octave.
> >
> > Is the problem solved?
> >
> 
> Yes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?43505

Thanks for your reply.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]