octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [mxe-octave] dev branch: build failure in documentation stage? (was


From: Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Subject: Re: [mxe-octave] dev branch: build failure in documentation stage? (was Re: [mxe-octave] dev branch: build failure in install stage?)
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 18:49:52 +0900 (JST)

Philip. Sorry I made a mistake to send mail only to you.

> From: Philip Nienhuis 
> To: Tatsuro MATSUOKA ; Mike Miller 
> Cc: "octave-maintainers
> Date: 2016/7/22, Fri 16:55
> Subject: Re: [mxe-octave] dev branch: build failure in documentation stage? 
> (was Re: [mxe-octave] dev branch: build failure in install stage?)
> 
>T atsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
>>>  Tatsuro, when you made the archive, did you use the 'make dist' 
> target?
>
>>>  Or did you just tar up the contents of the hg working directory after
>>>  running bootstrap? The proper steps to create a source tarball are
>>> 
>>>     ./bootstrap && ./configure && make all && 
> make dist
> 
> @Mike: all in one directory? I usually make dist archives in a separate build 
> dir as well.
> 
> <snip>
> 
>>  I did the above.
>>  After "make dist", octave-4.1.0+.tar.gz was generated in build 
> directory.
>
>>  The archived file contained the documentation.
>
>>  Then I executed mxe-octave using this octave-4.1.0+.tar.gz.
>>  make zip-dist
>
>>  Build of default-octave step was stopped.
>
>>  /bin/bash run-octave --norc --silent --no-history 
> /home/tatsuro/work/octave/mxe-octave/mxe-octave-dev-w64/tmp-default-octave/octave-4.1.0+/doc/interpreter/mk_doc_cache.m
>  
>
> /home/tatsuro/work/octave/mxe-octave/mxe-octave-dev-w64/tmp-default-octave/octave-4.1.0+
>  
> /home/tatsuro/work/octave/mxe-octave/mxe-octave-dev-w64/tmp-default-octave/octave-4.1.0+/doc/interpreter/macros.texi
>  
> libinterp/DOCSTRINGS scripts/DOCSTRINGS > doc/interpreter/doc-cache-t 
> && \
>>  mv doc/interpreter/doc-cache-t doc/interpreter/doc-cache
>
> /home/tatsuro/work/octave/mxe-octave/mxe-octave-dev-w64/tmp-default-octave/octave-4.1.0+/.build/libtool:
>  
> line 11645: 
> /home/tatsuro/work/octave/mxe-octave/mxe-octave-dev-w64/tmp-default-octave/octave-4.1.0+/.build/src/octave:
>  
> No such file or directory
>>  make[4]: *** [doc/interpreter/doc-cache] Error 127
>>  make[4]: Leaving directory 
> `/home/tatsuro/work/octave/mxe-octave/mxe-octave-dev-w64/tmp-default-octave/octave-4.1.0+/.build'
>>  make[3]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
>>  make[3]: Leaving directory 
> `/home/tatsuro/work/octave/mxe-octave/mxe-octave-dev-w64/tmp-default-octave/octave-4.1.0+/.build'
>>  make[2]: *** [install] Error 2
>>  make[2]: Leaving directory 
> `/home/tatsuro/work/octave/mxe-octave/mxe-octave-dev-w64/tmp-default-octave/octave-4.1.0+/.build'
>>  make[1]: *** [build-only-default-octave] Error 2
>>  make[1]: Leaving directory 
> `/home/tatsuro/work/octave/mxe-octave/mxe-octave-dev-w64'
>
>>  As you said, run-octave is meaningless because this is cross-build.
>
>>  How can I do ?
> 
> Tatsuro,
> 
> Yesterday I successfully built dev Octave tip with mxe, incl. docs.
> 
> One thing that I found is that on the Linux side it is seems more reliable 
> for 
> subsequent mxe-octave cross-builds, to make a complete Linux build in one 
> step.
> I.e., not having a build, pulling/updating the source tree and then do an 
> incremental "make".
> Rather wipe the entire build dir and then do configure && make before 
> making a dist archive (make all dist).
> configure && make in an existing build dir doesn't *seem* to be 
> sufficient - at least for me.
> 
> (slightly OT
> Next thing for me is that once in Windows, Octave can't find its docs (the 
> docs pane mentions "the info file or compressed version does not 
> exist".
> The Start Menu shortcuts to the html and pdf files do work fine, however. 
> Where 
> are those info or compressed files to be found?)
> 
> Philip
> 

Philip. Thanks for your suggestion.

I usually make build directory like "build" and "cd ..../build" and ../(octave 
source dir)/configure ......
I now try not to make build directory and build in source directory on Ubuntu.

I will report results tomorrow.  

Tatsuro




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]