Re: Default merged to stable for upcoming 4.2 release

[c.]

On 6 Oct 2016, at 08:39, Marco Caliari <address@hidden> wrote:

> There is another point, which I supposed was in the bug tracker, but that I 
> cannot find: in integrate_adaptive, the new dt uses (order + 1). In this 
> case, order should be the order of the embedded method with lowest order. But 
> it is 5 in ode45, and 3 in ode23. Am I wrong, or should it be fixed?

I'm not sure about this one, for compatibility with Matlab we are using the 
highest order embedded method to compute the solution, so do we still need to 
use the lowest order for estimating the timestep? 
c.