Re: naming scheme for the GSL package

[Julien Bect]

Le 17/10/2016 à 20:39, Susi Lehtola a écrit :
> On 10/15/2016 11:27 PM, Julien Bect wrote:
> > Le 14/10/2016 à 00:57, ederag a écrit :
> > > > I propose to keep full GSL names to solve both problems.
> > > >
> > > > Any opinions ?
> > > >
> > > > @++
> > > > Julien
> > > Agreed, full GSL names would be much better.
> >
> > Thanks ederag.  Any other opinion ?
>
> This would break backward compatibility in a serious way...

Hi Susi,

I know, but that is not the question.

If people agree with me that full GSL names are better, I will deprecate 
the old function names but keep them around for some time (perhaps a 
very long time).

By the way, backward compatibility aside, what is your opinion on this 
matter ?

@++
Julien