Re: naming scheme for the GSL package

[Susi Lehtola]

On 10/18/2016 01:58 AM, Julien Bect wrote:
> I know, but that is not the question.
>
> If people agree with me that full GSL names are better, I will deprecate
> the old function names but keep them around for some time (perhaps a
> very long time).
>
> By the way, backward compatibility aside, what is your opinion on this
> matter ?

I guess the consistency with gsl naming is a good argument, although I'm 
not totally sure if it's necessary to keep the whole "gsl_sf_" or if 
just "gsl_" would be better since it's shorter. But then again that 
wouldn't be very logical either, so I guess it's best to keep the 
original gsl function names.
--
Susi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
address@hidden