octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Implementing categorial function


From: Mike Miller
Subject: Re: Implementing categorial function
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 16:07:29 -0800
User-agent: NeoMutt/20161104 (1.7.1)

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 20:24:37 +0000, Carnë Draug wrote:
> Actually, for categorical arrays [1] old style @class directories seems
> to be enough.  No need for classdef.

Agree, there doesn't seem to be a need for any classdef, so using an old
style class would probably be safer and easier to debug at this point.

Switching the constructor to a classdef value class constructor later
would be pretty simple, if needed for features or performance.  Methods
and overloaded functions in the @categorical directory should be
compatible with either class definition style.

-- 
mike



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]