[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ? |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Mar 2017 02:04:34 +0900 (JST) |
--- jwe
> On 03/17/2017 03:13 AM, Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
>
> > Perhaps my build failed without --enrable-fortran-int64.
> > (That option was not required for mxe-build before I think )
> >
> > I am trying rebuild 4.2.1 adding this option.
>
> That is not an option for the 4.2.1 configure script. With 4.2.1,
> --enable-64 should cause Octave to use 64-bit integers for array dimensions
> and indexing, and to expect the Fortran libraries like BLAS and LAPACK to
> also be compiled to use 64-bit integers for indexing.
>
> Was -fdefault-integer-8 added to FFLAGS by the configure script? That should
> also happen automatically.
>
> To know what happened, I'd have to see the output displayed when running the
> configure script and maybe the config.log file.
>
> jwe
>
>
Excuse me for my inadequate writing.
As written in the thead, --enrable-fortran-int64 is configure option of mxe-
octave.
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/mxe-octave-enable-fortran-int64-is-required-for-64-bits-index-build-td4682442.html
Tatsuro
- Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?, (continued)
- Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2017/03/15
- Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?, Julien Bect, 2017/03/16
- Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2017/03/16
- Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2017/03/16
- Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2017/03/16
- Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?, Julien Bect, 2017/03/16
- Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2017/03/16
- Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2017/03/17
- Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?, John W. Eaton, 2017/03/17
- Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2017/03/20
Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?,
address@hidden <=