octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GraphicsMagick warning


From: Rik
Subject: Re: GraphicsMagick warning
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:57:54 -0700

On 04/12/2017 08:04 AM, address@hidden wrote:
Subject:
Re: test imfinfo.m typo?
From:
Nicholas Jankowski <address@hidden>
Date:
04/12/2017 08:04 AM
To:
"Dmitri A. Sergatskov" <address@hidden>
CC:
octave-maintainers <address@hidden>, Soren Hauberg <address@hidden>, Carnë Draug <address@hidden>
List-Post:
<mailto:address@hidden>
Precedence:
list
MIME-Version:
1.0
References:
<address@hidden> <address@hidden> <address@hidden> <address@hidden> <address@hidden> <address@hidden>
In-Reply-To:
<address@hidden>
Message-ID:
<address@hidden>
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11469e5812849e054cf98737
Message:
5

On Apr 12, 2017 10:31 AM, "Dmitri A. Sergatskov" <address@hidden> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Carnë Draug <address@hidden> wrote:
​..
if we should keep backwards compatibility. 

​I think it should be fixed.​

  maybe it doesn't matter for this if it's new enough. But is it possible to alias such things? Have two labels tie to the same warning if there was a big concern about removing an errant label?

I don't think that is possible at this time.  And its probably not worth the effort to code it.  I would change the warning on the dev branch and make a note about it in the NEWS file.

--Rik


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]