octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: io.tst failures with lto


From: Dmitri A. Sergatskov
Subject: Re: io.tst failures with lto
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 00:03:50 -0500

On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 11:58 PM, Dmitri A. Sergatskov <address@hidden> wrote:
it is not only int32 that is wrong, the remaining (uint32, int64 , and uint64).
test io.tst bails out on the first failure.
here is the outputs (in bit format). Hopefully it gives some clues.


octave:35> s32
s32 =

  11011001101010010011101110110101  00000000000000000000000000000000
  11000101100111111011000110100100  00000000000000000000000000000000

octave:36> s32t
s32t =

  11011001101010010011101110110101  01110101100110011111110000101100
  11000101100111111011000110100100  01100110010000110100110100010010

octave:37> u32
u32 =

  01111101110100100011100010001100  00000000000000000000000000000000
  01101110001010010011001010000101  00000000000000000000000000000000

octave:38> u32t
u32t =

  01111101110100100011100010001100  00000000000000000000000000000000
  01101110001010010011001010000101  01010111010110010101100100101001

octave:39> s64
s64 =

  0010111010011111101011110001110101000010001110001100100000000000  0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
  0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000  0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

octave:40> s64t
s64t =

  0010111010011111101011110001110101000010001110001100100000000000  0100110010110010101100011000100101111001100001000111100000000000
  1000010011110111110110001111110001000000110100101011010000000000  0001001101110100101111011111001010101101000010111010100000000000

octave:41> u64
u64 =

  0010111000101000100110001001100001111111010100110000000000000000  0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
  0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000  0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

octave:42> u64t
u64t =

  0010111000101000100110001001100001111111010100110000000000000000  0001000101000011111110000010001110011011000010110001100000000000
  0011001100101100000100111000100000101111100010001110000000000000  0101101110101110011011010010001010110110100111110001000000000000


Dmitri.


​Here is the test file. Note,  if you read it with non-lto binary the values will be different again.​

​Dmitri.

Attachment: t1.hdf5
Description: Binary data


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]