Wording about oct files

[Robert Funnell]

At the beginning of the page 
https://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/v4.2.1/Getting-Started-with-Oct_002dFiles.html 
it says 'Oct-files are pieces of C++ code that have been compiled with 
the Octave API into a dynamically loadable object.'

When I first read this, I understood that the .oct file contains C++ 
code. After reading further, I understand that the .oct file contains 
the result of compiling the code, not the code itself, and that the 
code doesn't have to be C++ but can also be C or Fortran.

Would it not be better to say 'Oct files contain dynamically loadable 
objects that result from compiling C++, C or Fortran code with the 
Octave API'?

The second sentence says 'They take their name from the file which 
contains the object which has the extension .oct.' This might be a bit 
easier to read as 'They take their name from the file that contains 
the object, which has the extension .oct.' It might suffice to just 
say 'The file extension is .oct.'

- Robert