Re: Replace OCTAVE_LOCAL_BUFFER implementation with std::unique_ptr?

[John W. Eaton]

On 07/21/2017 12:31 AM, Rik wrote:

> There were only a few instances of static buffers which I changed to use
> local variables in this cset
> (http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/cda0614beaec).

Thanks.

I admit to having to read about the meaning of this type of statement 
that appears in your patch:

  int arg_used[7] {};

and I'm still a bit confused.  Is there any difference between this 
syntax and

  int arg_used[7] = {};

?  They both initialize the elements of the array to 0, correct?

Should we have a preferred style for this?

jwe