octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Windows GUI startup message truncated


From: Torsten
Subject: Re: Windows GUI startup message truncated
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2017 09:16:40 +0100

On 01.12.2017 23:03, Rik wrote:
> On 12/01/2017 09:00 AM, address@hidden wrote:
>> Subject:
>> Re: Windows GUI startup message truncated
>> From:
>> PhilipNienhuis <address@hidden>
>> Date:
>> 11/30/2017 10:06 AM
>>
>> To:
>> address@hidden
>>
>> List-Post:
>> <mailto:address@hidden>
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding:
>> 7bit
>> Precedence:
>> list
>> MIME-Version:
>> 1.0
>> References:
>> <address@hidden>
>> In-Reply-To:
>> <address@hidden>
>> Message-ID:
>> <address@hidden>
>> Content-Type:
>> text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>> Message:
>> 2
>>
>>
>> John W. Eaton wrote
>>> See attached image.
>>>
>>> I installed one of the buildbot builds (w64 with 32-bit indexing) and 
>>> this is what I see when Octave starts.  The startup message is truncated 
>>> to 14 columns.
>>>
>>> Thinking there could be some init file issue, I tried removing the 
>>> ~/.config directory with the same results.
>>>
>>> Text entered at the command prompt and output from commands are not 
>>> truncated, just the startup message.
>>>
>>> Does anyone have an idea about what could cause this?  I've never seen 
>>> this problem before.
>>>  
>> I first thought (as usual) that it was caused by something in my own
>> dev-octave or mxe-octave build tree (both are somewhat adapted locally), but
>> good to know that it is "officially confirmed".
>>
>> Whatever the cause, it happened between 16 (still good) and 19 November
>> (truncated), because I have mxe-octave builds of those dates installed here
>> to check. My cross-builds are always based on the latest default branch.
>> tips
>>
>> Philip
> 
> That's a very handy bracketing.  Looking through the Mercurial log, this
> cset seems to be the only one directed at windows.
> 
> changeset:   24275:e9fe31118542
> user:        Torsten <address@hidden>
> date:        Sat Nov 18 11:50:16 2017 +0100
> summary:     improve re-docking of a floating widget under windows
> 
> --Rik

I will have a look at this. The strange thing is that starting with

changeset:   24318:a17862b28f0d
user:        Torsten <address@hidden>
date:        Mon Nov 27 20:38:35 2017 +0100
summary:     handle floating widgets on all platforms as done on windows
(bug #52378)

the new re-docking approach is used on all platforms. Are there any
observations of this effect on non-windows platforms so far?

Torsten





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]