[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Om-synth] patchage & libjack
From: |
Nigel Henry |
Subject: |
Re: [Om-synth] patchage & libjack |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:06:51 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.2 |
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 02:06, Dave Robillard wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-24-10 at 22:33 +0000, Nigel Henry wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 October 2005 21:59, elgrande wrote:
> > > Antonio wrote:
> > > >Hi,
> > > >
> > > >2005/10/25, elgrande <address@hidden>:
> > > >[cut]
> > > >
> > > >>demudi:~# ls -l /usr/local/lib/libjack.so.0*
> > > >>lrwxrwxrwx 1 root staff 17 2005-10-25 11:23
> > > >>/usr/local/lib/libjack.so.0 -> libjack.so.0.0.23
> > > >>-rwxr-xr-x 1 root staff 177778 2005-10-25 11:23
> > > >>/usr/local/lib/libjack.so.0.0.23
> > > >>demudi:~#
> > > >
> > > >Why do you have libjack in /usr/local/lib and not in /usr/lib/ where
> > > >it should be, installing the libjack0.80.0-dev package?
> > >
> > > Hmmm.. probably, because I compiled jack myself. (Thats why local...)
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Om-synth mailing list
> > > address@hidden
> > > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/om-synth
> >
> > Don't worry. I've only just found out the syntax for installing stuff
> > where you want it to be installed. ./configure --prefix=/usr should get
> > configure to put it in /usr/lib , rather than letting the default
> > ./configure put it in /usr/local . Nigel. (still being assymilated) and
> > I've probably spelt that wrong.
>
> If you run a distro with a package system (ie basically every
> distribution in existance except possibly Slackware) DO NOT DO THIS
> unless you really, really, REALLY, know exactly what you're doing.
> You'll break your packaging system and hose your system.
>
> /usr/local exists for a reason
>
> -DR-
Hi Dave. The only reason I mentioned using /usr rather than /usr/local , was
because of continual problems I'm having with liblo-0.22, which I installed
in /usr/local. (installed version on FC2 & FC3 is only liblo-0.18). I'm not
very up to speed on compiling stuff, but would have thought that pkg-config
would have looked for it's .pc files in /usrlib/pkgconfig, and
also /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig. This is obviously not so, as ./configure
stops, complaining that pkg-config can only find liblo-0.18 (the one
in /usr/lib/pkgconfig) . I don't expect you to troubleshoot this. You've
obviously enough to do. I'll press on, and try and learn a bit more about
compiling from source tarballs. Nigel.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Om-synth mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/om-synth
- Re: [Om-synth] patchage & libjack, (continued)
- Re: [Om-synth] patchage & libjack, Antonio, 2005/10/25
- Re: [Om-synth] patchage & libjack, elgrande, 2005/10/25
- Re: [Om-synth] patchage & libjack, Nigel Henry, 2005/10/25
- Re: [Om-synth] patchage & libjack, Dave Robillard, 2005/10/25
- [Om-synth] Re: patchage & libjack, Loki Davison, 2005/10/26
- Re: [Om-synth] Re: patchage & libjack, elgrande, 2005/10/26
- Re: [Om-synth] Re: patchage & libjack, Dave Robillard, 2005/10/26
- Re: [Om-synth] patchage & libjack, elgrande, 2005/10/26
- Re: [Om-synth] patchage & libjack, Dave Robillard, 2005/10/26
- Re: [Om-synth] patchage & libjack, Esben Stien, 2005/10/26
- Re: [Om-synth] patchage & libjack,
Nigel Henry <=
- Re: [Om-synth] patchage & libjack, Dave Robillard, 2005/10/26
- [Om-synth] /usr/bin/ld: crt1.o: No such file: No such file or directory, elgrande, 2005/10/27
- Re: [Om-synth] /usr/bin/ld: crt1.o: No such file: No such file or directory, elgrande, 2005/10/27
- Re: [Om-synth] /usr/bin/ld: crt1.o: No such file: No such file or directory, Dave Robillard, 2005/10/28
- Re: [Om-synth] /usr/bin/ld: crt1.o: No such file: No such file or directory, elgrande, 2005/10/28
- [Om-synth] lash, elgrande, 2005/10/28
- Re: [Om-synth] lash, Antonio, 2005/10/29
- Re: [Om-synth] om and lash memory usage, Dave Robillard, 2005/10/25
- Re: [Om-synth] om and lash memory usage, Antonio, 2005/10/26
- Re: [Om-synth] om and lash memory usage, Dave Robillard, 2005/10/26