[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Om-synth] om and lash memory usage
From: |
Dave Robillard |
Subject: |
Re: [Om-synth] om and lash memory usage |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:30:05 +1000 |
On Thu, 2005-27-10 at 15:54 +0200, Antonio wrote:
> 2005/10/26, Dave Robillard <address@hidden>:
> [cut]
> > Hmm... that's quite a bit larger. :/
> >
> > Do you have a patch(es) loaded?
>
> Nope. I had just created an empty patch, but also loading a (little)
> patch doesn't increase too much the memory usage. Seems to me that the
> memory consumption is decreased in om nearly of 30MB, while is quite
> the same in om_gtk.
Yes, I havn't done anything to om_gtk. It shouldn't be mlockall'ed, so
it shouldn't be as important. Almost all of the overhead there is GTK
and GnomeCanvas :/
Strange that Om is so much larger on your machine than mine though.
-DR-
- [Om-synth] /usr/bin/ld: crt1.o: No such file: No such file or directory, (continued)
- [Om-synth] /usr/bin/ld: crt1.o: No such file: No such file or directory, elgrande, 2005/10/27
- Re: [Om-synth] /usr/bin/ld: crt1.o: No such file: No such file or directory, elgrande, 2005/10/27
- Re: [Om-synth] /usr/bin/ld: crt1.o: No such file: No such file or directory, Dave Robillard, 2005/10/28
- Re: [Om-synth] /usr/bin/ld: crt1.o: No such file: No such file or directory, elgrande, 2005/10/28
- [Om-synth] lash, elgrande, 2005/10/28
- Re: [Om-synth] lash, Antonio, 2005/10/29
- Re: [Om-synth] om and lash memory usage, Dave Robillard, 2005/10/25
- Re: [Om-synth] om and lash memory usage, Antonio, 2005/10/26
- Re: [Om-synth] om and lash memory usage, Dave Robillard, 2005/10/26
- Re: [Om-synth] om and lash memory usage, Antonio, 2005/10/27
- Re: [Om-synth] om and lash memory usage,
Dave Robillard <=
Re: [Om-synth] om and lash memory usage, Antonio, 2005/10/25