om-synth
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Om-synth] Om problems


From: Dave Robillard
Subject: Re: [Om-synth] Om problems
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:45:29 -0500

On Mon, 2006-30-01 at 08:44 +0000, Ross Clement wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-01-29 at 18:10 -0500, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-29-01 at 02:09 +0000, Ross Clement wrote:
[snip]
> > > However, as soon as I run it, I get a crash. Does anyone
> > > know what might be going wrong?
> > > 
> > > I run the following 
> > > 
> > > jackd -d alsa
> > > om
> > > om_gtk
> > > 
> > > Om starts and seems happy until I start om_gtk, then I get:
> > > 
> > > om
> > > [AlsaMidiDriver] Successfully opened ALSA sequencer.
> > > [OSC] Started OSC server at osc.udp://clarissa:16180/
> > > [PreProcessor] Launching thread.
> > > [PostProcessor] Starting.
> > > [JackAudioDriver] Activated Jack client.
> > > [AlsaMidiDriver] Started realtime MIDI thread (SCHED_FIFO, priority 10)
> > > [OSC] Registered client osc.udp://clarissa:17904/ (1 clients)
> > > [JackAudioDriver] Enabling.
> > > *** glibc detected *** om: double free or corruption (out): 0xb7d396d8
> > > ***
> > > ======= Backtrace: =========
> > > /lib/libc.so.6[0x4e7424]
> > > /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_free+0x77)[0x4e795f]
> > > /lib/libc.so.6(freeaddrinfo+0x35)[0x53583e]
> > > /usr/local/lib/liblo.so.0[0xe78359]
> > > /usr/local/lib/liblo.so.0(lo_send_message_from+0x45)[0xe784a1]
> > > /usr/local/lib/liblo.so.0(lo_send_message+0x21)[0xe784e1]
> > > /usr/local/lib/liblo.so.0(lo_send_internal+0x77)[0xe7855f]
> > > om[0x805756d]
> > > om[0x805768f]
> > > om[0x807243d]
> > > /lib/libpthread.so.0[0x6ccb80]
> > > /lib/libc.so.6(__clone+0x5e)[0x54edee]
> > 
> > Hm.. that' interesting.  lo_send_message_from is a new function in the
> > latest version of liblo (which has a new maintainer) which I havn't
> > tried yet.
> > 
> 
> I have liblo-0.23.tar.gz. I built it from source. My distro is Fedora
> Core 4, and liblo isn't (as far as I can see) available through any of
> the yum repos I'm using.

Could you try liblo 0.22 please?

-DR-






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]