[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-devel] Seeking advice on Pan license issue with optional TLS co
From: |
Dominique Dumont |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-devel] Seeking advice on Pan license issue with optional TLS component |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Mar 2013 15:47:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) |
Hello Heinrich
Le Saturday 16 February 2013 14:52:15, Heinrich Müller a écrit :
> Thanks for the info, i think i'll switch over to using PolarSSL which is
> GPLv2
This switch is no longer required: Gnutls 3.1.10 now has LGPLv2.1+ again.
http://lists.gnutls.org/pipermail/gnutls-devel/2013-March/006202.html
Thanks to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo for the heads up.
All the best
Dominique
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: [Pan-devel] Seeking advice on Pan license issue with optional TLS component,
Dominique Dumont <=