[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] more troubles with 0.12 (long)
From: |
mdew |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] more troubles with 0.12 (long) |
Date: |
24 Jun 2002 00:30:47 +1200 |
On Sun, 2002-06-23 at 05:47, Beartooth wrote:
>
> When I got to the site Toby Inkster recommended, I thought
> I remembered having discovered I could use 586 stuff; so I
> downloaded it, tried it, and got:
> ===============================================================
> address@hidden btth]# rpm -Uvh pan-0.12.0-1.i586.rpm
> error: failed dependencies:
> glib2 >= 2.0.4 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> gtk2 >= 2.0.5 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libxml2 >= 2.4.22 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libatk-1.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libglib-2.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libgmodule-2.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libgobject-2.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libgthread-2.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libpango-1.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libpangox-1.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libpangoxft-1.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> address@hidden btth]#
> ====================================================================
> Well, methought, OK, maybe I only dreamt of discovering I
> could use 586. So I downloaded the 386 and got:
> =================================================================
> address@hidden btth]# rpm -Uvh pan-0.12.0-1.i386.rpm
> error: failed dependencies:
> glib2 >= 2.0.4 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> gtk2 >= 2.0.5 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libxml2 >= 2.4.22 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libatk-1.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libglib-2.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libgmodule-2.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libgobject-2.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libgthread-2.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libpango-1.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libpangox-1.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libpangoxft-1.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> address@hidden btth]#
> ========================================================================
> That left 686, and I tried it:
> ======================================================================
> address@hidden btth]# rpm -Uvh pan-0.12.0-1.i686.rpm
> error: failed dependencies:
> glib2 >= 2.0.4 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> gtk2 >= 2.0.5 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libxml2 >= 2.4.22 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libatk-1.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libglib-2.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libgmodule-2.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libgobject-2.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libgthread-2.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libpango-1.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libpangox-1.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> libpangoxft-1.0.so.0 is needed by pan-0.12.0-1
> address@hidden btth]#
> =================================================================
>
> Now, I'm not sophisticated enough to know how to display
> two, let alone all three of those failed dependency lists alongside
> one another, let alone intershuffle them; and I'm too lazy to
> compare back & forth the hard way. But they sure all three *look*
> suspiciously similar.
>
> Then methought I might be dreaming *now*; so, just to
> check, I ran the older 386 again; sure enough, I got:
> =================================================================
> address@hidden btth]# rpm -Uvh pan-0.11.2-3.i386.rpm
> Preparing...
> ########################################### [100%]
> package pan-0.11.2-3 is already installed
> address@hidden btth]#
> ==================================================================
>
> So where are all these failed dependencies coming from all
> of a sudden? I have a subscription to RH Errata alerts, and I've
> been downloading faithfully -- *almost* everything, whether I
> understand it or not -- except developer packages ....
>
> My hopes of ever being a developer in my own right are
> significantly less than those of the proverbial celluloid
> hound in hell; I just wanna offer a little naive user feedback
> to youss real guyss! Maybe I have to have them even just to *run*
> Pan? :-(
>
> If so -- is there an easy way to handle this? Or had I
> better get back from outta my depth 'fore i drown in alien
> electrons?
> --
> RR 'Beartooth' Neuswanger <karhunhammas (at) lserv.com>
> double retiree & linux greenhorn w/RH 7.2
> Delenda est MegaSleazo!
why not resolve the dependancies then? Its pretty obvious it needs
gtk+-2.0.5, glib-2.0.4 etc installed first.
--
ph33r!
Linux mdew 2.4.19-pre10-xfs-aa2 #11 Tue Jun 18 11:52:55 NZST 2002 i686
unknown
GPG Key: http://mdew.orcon.net.nz/gpg
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part