[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Pan-users] Readability suggestion. Feature request.
From: |
Maurizio Colucci |
Subject: |
[Pan-users] Readability suggestion. Feature request. |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Jun 2003 11:02:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.2 |
Hello,
Please take a time and compare the readability of current pan with
Agent. Suppose I want to find the reply of John to my message:
Pan:
Hello! How are you! This is the title. me
Re: Hello! How are you! This is the title. jack
Re: Hello! How are you! This is the title. frank
Re: Hello! How are you! This is the title. frank
Re: Hello! How are you! This is the title. john
Re: Hello! How are you! This is the title. me
Re: Hello! How are you! This is the title. jack
Re: Hello! How are you! This is the title. jack
Re: Hello! How are you! This is the title. jack
Re: Hello! How are you! This is the title. frank <<< that's it
Re: Hello! How are you! This is the title. john
Agent:
Hello! How are you! This is the title. me
jack
frank
frank
john
me
jack
jack
jack
frank <<< that's it
john
Of course Agent is better.
The problem in Pan is that the topic rarely changes, nevertheless it
is given a big importance (by means of indentation), whereas the
author is more important, but it is given minor importance by means of
no indentation.
Second, redundant info is annoying. The topic of replies is totally
irrelevant, and can be seen inside the message when it (rarely)
changes.
I don't know why, but I don't expect much agreement. :-)
Maurizio
Re: [Pan-users] Readability suggestion. Feature request., Charles Kerr, 2003/06/03