[Pan-users] Glib dependency and nodeps?

[Staci]

Hello!

I run Slackware 8.1, and I just tried to upgrade my Pan to 0.14 cuz it was 
saving all the parts in addition to
the binaries (really weird and appears to be a bug in 0.11, it compiles and 
decodes, but giving me a copy for
each part...so I have x-song.mp3 which is 7.9mb, but then x-song-1.mp3, 
x-song-2.mp3, etc...each of which is ALSO
7.9mb.).

But when I tried to upgrade it gave me the following output to ./configure:

 ./configure
checking for intltool >= 0.21... 0.25 found
checking for perl... /usr/bin/perl
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/ginstall -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking for working aclocal-1.4... missing
checking for working autoconf... found
checking for working automake-1.4... missing
checking for working autoheader... found
checking for working makeinfo... found
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
checking for gcc... gcc
checking for C compiler default output... a.out
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of executables...
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed
checking for fchmod... yes
checking for localtime_r... yes
checking for gmtime_r... yes
checking for strerror in -lcposix... no
checking for gcc... (cached) gcc
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... (cached) yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... (cached) yes
checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... (cached) none needed
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
checking for gawk... gawk
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/ginstall -c
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... (cached) yes
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking for egrep... grep -E
checking for ANSI C header files... yes
checking for sys/types.h... yes
checking for sys/stat.h... yes
checking for stdlib.h... yes
checking for string.h... yes
checking for memory.h... yes
checking for strings.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking locale.h usability... yes
checking locale.h presence... yes
checking for locale.h... yes
checking for LC_MESSAGES... yes
checking libintl.h usability... yes
checking libintl.h presence... yes
checking for libintl.h... yes
checking for dgettext in libc... yes
checking for bind_textdomain_codeset... yes
checking for msgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt
checking for dcgettext... yes
checking for gmsgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt
checking for xgettext... /usr/bin/xgettext
checking for catalogs to be installed...  am ca cs da de el en_GB es et fi fr 
ga gl hu it ja ko lt lv no nl pl pt
pt_BR ru sk sl sp sr sv tr uk zh_CN
checking for bind_textdomain_codeset... (cached) yes
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking for glib-2.0 >= 2.0.4
                        gobject-2.0 >= 2.0.4
                        gthread-2.0 >= 2.0.4... Package glib-2.0 was not found 
in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `glib-2.0.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
No package 'glib-2.0' found

configure: error: Library requirements (glib-2.0 >= 2.0.4
                        gobject-2.0 >= 2.0.4
                        gthread-2.0 >= 2.0.4) not met; consider adjusting the 
PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment
variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find 
them.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Can I ADD the glib 2.0 libraries and keep my other ones too?  I believe my glib 
is 1.2.10, but above it seems to
be finding 2.0.x??  Am I reading that right?

(Incidentally, had this been an odd case, it would have been REALLY nice to be 
able to run configure as
"--nodeps" but you don't offer than option...a suggestion for the future.  I 
know it wouldn't solve this prob but
it could hypothetically solve a hypothetical prob in the future. ;) )



Thanks,
sl