[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] Re: Forcing an expire?
From: |
K. Haley |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] Re: Forcing an expire? |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:28:53 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2009-07-11 01:44, K. Haley wrote:
>> Definitely barking up the wrong tree for tasks. A simpler solution that
>> doesn't require any new dependencies would be one file per task.
>> Obviously not a solution for most users that don't have such large tasks
>> files, but it might be possible to make it a run time option.
>
> Or a separate "flush tasks.nzb" thread, which would not block any
> other process.
That would be a problem since pan doesn't copy the tasks to update the
file. Using a seperate thread would result in tasks changing during the
update.
> That would be a serious win! And *very* much appreciated.
>
Done, new preference is tasks-nzb-delay. It's in seconds.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- ls and alias (was Re: [Pan-users] Re: Forcing an expire?), (continued)
- ls and alias (was Re: [Pan-users] Re: Forcing an expire?), Ron Johnson, 2009/07/09
- [Pan-users] Re: Forcing an expire?, Duncan, 2009/07/09
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Forcing an expire?, Ron Johnson, 2009/07/09
- [Pan-users] Re: Forcing an expire?, Duncan, 2009/07/09
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Forcing an expire?, Ron Johnson, 2009/07/09
- [Pan-users] Re: Forcing an expire?, Duncan, 2009/07/09
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Forcing an expire?, Ron Johnson, 2009/07/10
- [Pan-users] Re: Forcing an expire?, Duncan, 2009/07/10
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Forcing an expire?, K. Haley, 2009/07/11
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Forcing an expire?, Ron Johnson, 2009/07/11
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Forcing an expire?,
K. Haley <=
- [Pan-users] Re: Forcing an expire?, Duncan, 2009/07/12
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Forcing an expire?, Ron Johnson, 2009/07/11
- [Pan-users] Re: Forcing an expire?, Duncan, 2009/07/10