[paparazzi-commits] [paparazzi/paparazzi] 78ede4: [abi] define ABI x_SENDER_IDs in abi_sender_ids.h

[GitHub]

  Branch: refs/heads/baro_abi
  Home:   https://github.com/paparazzi/paparazzi
  Commit: 78ede475d4c5af0361a6126398bb1608088cf62a
      
https://github.com/paparazzi/paparazzi/commit/78ede475d4c5af0361a6126398bb1608088cf62a
  Author: Felix Ruess <address@hidden>
  Date:   2013-10-10 (Thu, 10 Oct 2013)

  Changed paths:
    M conf/airframes/examples/Twinstar_energyadaptive.xml
    M sw/airborne/boards/apogee/baro_board.c
    M sw/airborne/boards/ardrone/baro_board.c
    M sw/airborne/boards/baro_board_ms5611_i2c.c
    M sw/airborne/boards/baro_board_ms5611_spi.c
    M sw/airborne/boards/booz/baro_board.c
    M sw/airborne/boards/lisa_l/baro_board.c
    M sw/airborne/boards/lisa_m/baro_board.c
    M sw/airborne/boards/navgo/baro_board.c
    M sw/airborne/boards/pc/baro_board.c
    M sw/airborne/boards/umarim/baro_board.c
    M sw/airborne/modules/sensors/baro_MS5534A.c
    M sw/airborne/modules/sensors/baro_amsys.c
    M sw/airborne/modules/sensors/baro_bmp.c
    M sw/airborne/modules/sensors/baro_ets.c
    M sw/airborne/modules/sensors/baro_hca.c
    M sw/airborne/modules/sensors/baro_mpl3115.c
    M sw/airborne/modules/sensors/baro_ms5611_i2c.c
    M sw/airborne/modules/sensors/baro_ms5611_spi.c
    M sw/airborne/modules/sensors/baro_scp.c
    M sw/airborne/modules/sensors/baro_scp_i2c.c
    M sw/airborne/modules/sensors/baro_sim.c
    M sw/airborne/modules/sensors/pressure_board_navarro.c
    M sw/airborne/subsystems/abi_common.h
    A sw/airborne/subsystems/abi_sender_ids.h
    M sw/airborne/subsystems/ins/ins_alt_float.c
    M sw/airborne/subsystems/ins/ins_int.c

  Log Message:
  -----------
  [abi] define ABI x_SENDER_IDs in abi_sender_ids.h

Same BARO_BOARD_SENDER_ID for all baro_board implementations.
Since there can only be one baro_board at the same time and
this provides a good default for INS_BARO_ID.

The abi_sender_ids.h can be considered a temporary solution,
we might come up with a different scheme later...