[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [paragui-users] Thoughts on: Dual licensing? ParaGUI contributors pl
From: |
Teunis Peters |
Subject: |
Re: [paragui-users] Thoughts on: Dual licensing? ParaGUI contributors please! |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Sep 2003 07:20:54 -0700 (PDT) |
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Asko Kauppi wrote:
>
> what's the idea of MIT/GPL and not just MIT?
>
> my suggestion was the FreeType2 BSD-like/GPL dual license, since FT2 is
> included anyways, and it has the "copyright clause" you wanted.
this is the trouble:
- my code includes some modified glib (from GTK+2.0) (Library GPL license)
- the code uses SDL (Library GPL license)
- The C++ ParaGUI is Library GPL license as well.
There may be others as well. At this point from what I can tell, unless
ALL the authers of ALL the code are willing to dual license, it must
remain as it stands.
hrm.
*scritches head*
oh well.
I can't see around this for static programs.
dynamic programs aren't a problem.
*selfthinks* maybe look on www.embedded-linux.org and seeing what
solutions they have to this conundrum.
G'day, eh? :)
- Teunis