[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alternate termination sequence option --term-seq
From: |
Ole Tange |
Subject: |
Re: Alternate termination sequence option --term-seq |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Apr 2015 23:56:37 +0200 |
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Martin d'Anjou
<martin.danjou14@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here is an implementation of how the user can specify an alternate
> termination sequence:
> https://github.com/martinda/gnu-parallel/compare/optional-termination-sequence?expand=1
>
> Your input is welcome.
Let us say you do not know that 9 = KILL (it took me several UNIX
years before I learned that), but you want to send kill -9.
How should that be expressed in --termseq?
Do I want to send the signal to the process group or just the process
(and will that make any difference in real life situations)?
/Ole
- Alternate termination sequence option --term-seq, Martin d'Anjou, 2015/04/20
- Re: Alternate termination sequence option --term-seq, Ole Tange, 2015/04/23
- Re: Alternate termination sequence option --term-seq,
Ole Tange <=
- Re: Alternate termination sequence option --term-seq, Martin d'Anjou, 2015/04/25
- Re: Alternate termination sequence option --term-seq, Ole Tange, 2015/04/27
- Re: Alternate termination sequence option --term-seq, Martin d'Anjou, 2015/04/28
- Re: Alternate termination sequence option --term-seq, Ole Tange, 2015/04/29
- Re: Alternate termination sequence option --term-seq, Rasmus Villemoes, 2015/04/29
- Re: Alternate termination sequence option --term-seq, Ole Tange, 2015/04/29
- Re: Alternate termination sequence option --term-seq, Martin d'Anjou, 2015/04/29
- Re: Alternate termination sequence option --term-seq, Rasmus Villemoes, 2015/04/30