Re: [Patch-gnuradio] Re: assert (dac_rate () == 128000000);

[Alexander Chemeris]

ping.
It works good now as far as I see:

With 64e6 clock it gives:
coarse_freq_1=16000000.000000
coarse_freq_2=32000000.000000
coarse_limit_1=8000000.000000
coarse_limit_2=24000000.000000
high_limit=44000000.000000

With 52e6 clock it gives:
coarse_freq_1=13000000.000000
coarse_freq_2=26000000.000000
coarse_limit_1=6500000.000000
coarse_limit_2=19500000.000000
high_limit=35750000.000000


On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 19:19, Alexander Chemeris
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 19:11, Eric Blossom <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 06:13:41PM +0300, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
>>> Ping on this.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 16:45, Eric Blossom <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 08:39:20AM -0500, Philip Balister wrote:
>>> >> On 12/17/2009 10:59 AM, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
>>> >> >Hi Eric,
>>> >> >
>>> >> >Here we go.
>>> >> >Is that the correct one?
>>> >>
>>> >> I added this one (and a few others) to:
>>> >>
>>> >> http://gnuradio.org/cgit/balister.git/log/?h=patches-from-list
>>> >
>>> > Thanks!  I'll look at it in the next day or so.
>>> >
>>> > Eric
>>
>> The calculation of high_limit is incorrect.
>> If you plug in 128e6 for dac_rate, you get a different answer the
>> original code.
>
> Ugh, stupid error. I was thinking about adc_rate() instead
> of dac_rate(). Should be fixed in this version.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Alexander Chemeris.
>



-- 
Regards,
Alexander Chemeris.