[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [pdf-devel] Patch for the Flate filter
From: |
jemarch |
Subject: |
Re: [pdf-devel] Patch for the Flate filter |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Oct 2008 23:28:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shijō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
> + /*
> + * As read in the zlib documentation, our cache size must be at
least 0.1%
> + * larger than the CHUNK size, plus 12 bytes.
> + * We assume that our cache size is of 4096 bytes.
> + */
> +#define PDF_STM_F_FLATE_CHUNK 1024
>
> What would happen if the user set a cache size of, say, 100 bytes? It
> is possible to set the chunk size dinamically?
Now that the issue arose I can say that this limitations are being,
in part, imposed by the Stream implementation and the last apply()
call JP mentioned in a previous email. The last apply() should be
called until EOF and not only once as I think it does now.
Do the new semantics fix this problem?
- [pdf-devel] Patch for the Flate filter, gerel, 2008/10/01
- Re: [pdf-devel] Patch for the Flate filter, jemarch, 2008/10/01
- Re: [pdf-devel] Patch for the Flate filter, gerel, 2008/10/01
- Re: [pdf-devel] Patch for the Flate filter, gerel, 2008/10/01
- Re: [pdf-devel] Patch for the Flate filter, jemarch, 2008/10/02
- Re: [pdf-devel] Patch for the Flate filter, gerel, 2008/10/02
- Re: [pdf-devel] Patch for the Flate filter, jemarch, 2008/10/03
- Re: [pdf-devel] Patch for the Flate filter, jemarch, 2008/10/03
- Re: [pdf-devel] Patch for the Flate filter, gerel, 2008/10/03
- Re: [pdf-devel] Patch for the Flate filter, jemarch, 2008/10/03
- Re: [pdf-devel] Patch for the Flate filter, jemarch, 2008/10/03