phpgroupware-developers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] Re: Standard source code header and php Do


From: Dave Hall
Subject: Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] Re: Standard source code header and php Documentor
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 10:42:08 +1000

address@hidden wrote:

> My thoughts on this discussion: Kai proposes do do some work that has
> not been done, and seems to be a very valuable contribution, 

It is only valuable if it can be used, which is my point.

> so I feel
> very unconfortable if the first answer he gets is of an agressive
> style. 

I am sorry if this has offended anyone, but I am not the only one who
has been aggressive.  One of Kai's first contacts with the project:

http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/phpgroupware-developers/2003-04/msg00138.html

Early bug reports:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=3382&group_id=509
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=3374&group_id=509

Failure to take note of feedback:
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=4016&group_id=509

I could find more if people would like.

> It is true that moving from one documentation style to another
> needs discussion, and Kai should have asked for this discussion,
> before heading in one direction.

Yes, this is part of the problem with Kai's (and probiz's) attitude
towards the project.  They decide something then try to impose it on the
project.  All subscribers to this list should be aware, the project
works on a collabrative model.

> But as I see it, we have the alternative between our current
> documentation style, which is used only partially by us, and not
> common among other projects, and a proposal to implement 
> completely -
> even if it takes some time - a new style that seems a sort of standard
> for many PHP projects. This proposal seems reasonable to me.

This may be the case, but this must be a decision of the project, not a
patch contributor.

> 
> Michael
> 
> "Chris Weiss" <address@hidden> a écrit:
> 
> >>So whats the problem? Maybe your statement on wiki isn't complete?
> >
> > from outside (since I'm not "core" and don't have API access 
> myself), it seems the
> > problem is that everything you submit is followed up by am out 
> of sorts discusion.
> >
> > Also keep in mind that some of us have been here for years and 
> still don't have API
> > commit access, and probably never will.  Unless you're actually 
> maintaining code for
> > the api there's no need, docs are not code, neither are lang 
> files, and neither
> > require much maintainance.  Both are very needed but neither 
> warrent api commit access.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Phpgroupware-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers
>

Attachment: dave.hall.vcf
Description: Card for <dave.hall@mbox.com.au>


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]