The posted comments at TechCrunch are also a good read. One can only annotate it, and that's a big difference.
For better and worse, Commercialism invaded the pure collaborative energy of the Net, and things began to take off in a different direction.
This lack of "Opt Out" mechanism runs counter to commonly accepted data privacy principles. The tagline on the home page states, "Buy, Sell and Trade Business Contacts".
I never found out who was responsible for this but it sure made me laugh.
The paper-objects were then photographed and composited in After Effects. And if you want to place an ad, no matter how explicit, how can you do so safely?
But it could make it that much harder for someone to eavesdrop, which is both a deterrent and an incentive to go after easier targets. Organized crime has simply gone high tech, although a single hacker can also do a lot of damage with identity theft. Despite being formally notified that you are violating SalonQuest's legal rights, you have continued to list additional Aquage products on eBay.
The paper-objects were then photographed and composited in After Effects.
These are talented people living off fear and adrenaline. Sounds great, doesn't it? For better and worse, Commercialism invaded the pure collaborative energy of the Net, and things began to take off in a different direction.
One could also dive into a discussion about the business ethics and why an "end justifies the means" rational is usually a slippery slope.
The tagline on the home page states, "Buy, Sell and Trade Business Contacts". But don't let that stop you from enjoying it online.
Also, you have continued to display copyrighted Aquage containers in your advertisements, yet another violation of SalonQuest's legal rights under the federal Copyright Act.
Again, most of the comments posted at TechCrunch were resoundingly negative. Just as long as it's not just encryption for encryption's sake. I think it's because it's unclear where the 'good vs.
Her eBay listing included her own photos of the product.
On the business side, I can see them engaging in industrial espionage and stealing trade secrets. And if you want to place an ad, no matter how explicit, how can you do so safely? In his "experiment", Jason Fortuny violated several ethical and social TOUs that many of us accept as basic privacy and communication rules of conduct. Public opinion, particularly in the blogosphere, can make or break a startup, and it would be unwise for them to ignore this reality, even if this generates a "buzz".