On Tuesday 04 February 2003 02:09 pm, Dan Kuykendall wrote:
Chris Weiss wrote:
I don't think there is a hard limit on the sessions, but just imaging
trying to stuff my 200meg archive folder in there, sounds like trouble
waiting to happen.
Yes, this is a good point. The thing that sucks is that certain apps
(possibly only email) ends up having its own crazy caching scheme.
I wish we could just find an IMAP server that used a SQL database
instead of Mailbox or Maildir. Then we could read it dirtectly and end
up with decent performance.
you do know about dbmail don't you?
http://www.dbmail.org
Dan Kuykendall (address@hidden) wrote*:
This is a good point, but your not completely correct either. It simply
takes the use of a share file location for the sessions files. So if you
use nfs or whatever and in the php.ini dictate that the sesion files be
kept on the share, then you can do load balancing just fine.
If people still feel that db sessions have some benefit, then I wont
fight to remove it. It doesnt matter to me that much.
in that case, the only benifit left is sessions tracking, which is a lot
harder to do with php4 sessions.
Yes, and this is a very valid issue.
_______________________________________________
Phpgroupware-users mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-users
_______________________________________________
Phpgroupware-users mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-users