[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Pika-dev] Re: hackerlab fsplay.[ch] status
|
From: |
Andreas Rottmann |
|
Subject: |
[Pika-dev] Re: hackerlab fsplay.[ch] status |
|
Date: |
Fri, 07 May 2004 17:22:03 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Rottmann <address@hidden> writes:
> Since you seem quite opposed to the memchunk idea, I took another look
> at the object data areas, and it seems instead of having the data in a
> separate memchunk, we might as well keep it in the hashtree items,
> thus avoiding the memchunk issue.
>
At the additional cost that the memory in object data area must be
copied, but I guess that's neglectable unless you stick large stuff in
there (would we?).
Andy
--
Andreas Rottmann | address@hidden | address@hidden | address@hidden
http://yi.org/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct,
not tried it. -- Donald E. Knuth
- [Pika-dev] hackerlab fsplay.[ch] status, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/05/02
- Re: [Pika-dev] hackerlab fsplay.[ch] status, Tom Lord, 2004/05/02
- Re: [Pika-dev] hackerlab fsplay.[ch] status, Tom Lord, 2004/05/06
- Re: [Pika-dev] hackerlab fsplay.[ch] status, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/05/06
- Re: [Pika-dev] hackerlab fsplay.[ch] status, Tom Lord, 2004/05/07
- Re: [Pika-dev] hackerlab fsplay.[ch] status, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/05/07
- [Pika-dev] Re: hackerlab fsplay.[ch] status,
Andreas Rottmann <=
- [Pika-dev] hashq values and weak references (was hackerlab fsplay.[ch] status), Tom Lord, 2004/05/08
- [Pika-dev] Re: hashq values and weak references, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/05/08
- [Pika-dev] Re: hashq values and weak references, Tom Lord, 2004/05/10
- [Pika-dev] Re: hashq values and weak references, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/05/10
Re: [Pika-dev] hackerlab fsplay.[ch] status, Tom Lord, 2004/05/06