|
From: | Martin Herren |
Subject: | Re: [Protux-devel] [Fwd: compile error] |
Date: | Thu, 15 May 2003 16:16:00 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011128 Netscape6/6.2.1 |
Remon Sijrier wrote:
yeah, when rewind is not declared in the std namespace, you have to remove the std:: in front of it, but to do this you have to change the name of Audio::rewind like you did. To do this change in CVS i prefer to wait until Luciano (the main develloper) has again an internet connection, because if we change to much the code, there will be problems to merge all what he develloped offline...Hi all,I'm following Protux-development for a while now. And it looks very promising! I looked around on the internet for good audio applications for (home) sound recording on the hard disk, but protux is the only one who fits to my needs it seems (well, after 2.0 is out :) ) So a few weeks ago I tried to compile the stable version and encountered the same problem with the rewind() function.I changed it to goto_begin() and everything works just fine now. Only thing is, you can't do much at the moment with protux :( I also had to remove the std:: before the rewind() call, don't know why, but now it works :)
If there are simpel things (I'm not a c++ programmer at the moment, only read the basics about it, did some stuff with Java) I can help with, let me know, the sooner this programm has a production level, the better it is ;). Because for audio recordings I have to deal with Windows, and I want to switch over to linux completely. This is the last thing I have to do within Windose :(in fact to regenerate new Makefile.in's from the Makefile.am's automake 1.5 is required... or at least it should be so...Oh, and I had a problem with automake, it only works with automake 1.4 It's maybe an idea to add this in the F.A.Q. , until the problem with multiple automake version are gone?
Hmm, and last but not least: I can't record with protux, after pressing <R> protux respond with: you have first to arm a track, but this is the way to arm a track, isn't it? and after a second <R> the recording starts? But nothing happens cause no track is armed, thats what protux said. Any help is appreciated :)To arm a track it should be <R> (previously it was <RT>), and to record it is just <SPACE> like playback, so it is possible to have full duplex record/playback (previously it was <R> for recording).Thank you very much Remon
(hope this is correct, don't have Protux at hand right now) /Martin
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |