Re: po/pspp.pot

[Ben Pfaff]

John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:

> I'm wondering whether we shouldn't remove po/pspp.pot from the CVS
> repository.  It's a built file, so there's no good reason for it to
> be there.  The only reason I added it in the first place is so that 
> translators can easily get hold of it without having to build pspp.
>
> But almost every change requires it to be rebuilt, but that will not
> happen unless make -f Smake is run.  So it's often out of date anyway,
> which means that the purpose of having it in CVS is largely defeated.
>
> What do people think?

I'd prefer not to keep it in CVS.  If a translator needs it and
has difficulty getting it, we can provide a copy.  (And so far we
don't have any translators.)
-- 
"The road to hell is paved with convenient shortcuts."
--Peter da Silva