Re: covariance test success

[Jason Stover]

On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:12:00AM +0000, John Darrington wrote:
> So, to answer the question what to do next, I propose:
> 
> 1. Change REGRESSION etc. to use new covariance routines. and test thoroughly.
> 
> 2. Fix up the missing value problem  and write some rigorous test routines.
> 
> 3. Drop the existing src/category.c and covariance-matrix.c
> 
> 4. Merge ?
> 
> 5. Extend src/math/categoricals.c to work with interactions between arbitrary
>    permutations of variables.  Possibly the file should be renamed to 
>    src/math/interactions.c  or similar ? 
> 
> 6. Write a super-dooper GLM routine using the new modules.

This sounds good to me. I'll start changing files on the covariance
branch to make use of covariance.c.