[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 03/10] arm/arm64: s
From: |
Andrew Jones |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 03/10] arm/arm64: smp: support more than 8 cpus |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:24:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.0.1 (2016-04-01) |
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 04:28:52PM +0200, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Drew,
>
> Proper commit message?
> ... also selects the vgic model corresponding to the host
Sure
> > Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > arm/run | 19 ++++++++++++-------
> > arm/selftest.c | 5 ++++-
> > lib/arm/asm/processor.h | 9 +++++++--
> > lib/arm/asm/setup.h | 4 ++--
> > lib/arm/setup.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> > lib/arm64/asm/processor.h | 9 +++++++--
> > 6 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arm/run b/arm/run
> > index a2f35ef6a7e63..2d0698619606e 100755
> > --- a/arm/run
> > +++ b/arm/run
> > @@ -31,13 +31,6 @@ if [ -z "$ACCEL" ]; then
> > fi
> > fi
> >
> > -if [ "$HOST" = "aarch64" ] && [ "$ACCEL" = "kvm" ]; then
> > - processor="host"
> > - if [ "$ARCH" = "arm" ]; then
> > - processor+=",aarch64=off"
> > - fi
> > -fi
> > -
> > qemu="${QEMU:-qemu-system-$ARCH_NAME}"
> > qpath=$(which $qemu 2>/dev/null)
> >
> > @@ -53,6 +46,18 @@ fi
> >
> > M='-machine virt'
> >
> > +if [ "$ACCEL" = "kvm" ]; then
> > + if $qemu $M,\? 2>&1 | grep gic-version > /dev/null; then
> > + M+=',gic-version=host'
> > + fi
> > + if [ "$HOST" = "aarch64" ]; then
> > + processor="host"
> > + if [ "$ARCH" = "arm" ]; then
> > + processor+=",aarch64=off"
> > + fi
> > + fi
> > +fi
> > +
> > if ! $qemu $M -device '?' 2>&1 | grep virtconsole > /dev/null; then
> > echo "$qpath doesn't support virtio-console for chr-testdev. Exiting."
> > exit 2
> > diff --git a/arm/selftest.c b/arm/selftest.c
> > index 196164f5313de..2f117f795d2dc 100644
> > --- a/arm/selftest.c
> > +++ b/arm/selftest.c
> > @@ -312,9 +312,10 @@ static bool psci_check(void)
> > static cpumask_t smp_reported;
> > static void cpu_report(void)
> > {
> > + unsigned long mpidr = get_mpidr();
> > int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> >
> > - report("CPU%d online", true, cpu);
> > + report("CPU(%3d) mpidr=%lx", mpidr_to_cpu(mpidr) == cpu, cpu, mpidr);
> > cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &smp_reported);
> > halt();
> > }
> > @@ -343,6 +344,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> >
> > } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "smp") == 0) {
> >
> > + unsigned long mpidr = get_mpidr();
> > int cpu;
> >
> > report("PSCI version", psci_check());
> > @@ -353,6 +355,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > smp_boot_secondary(cpu, cpu_report);
> > }
> >
> > + report("CPU(%3d) mpidr=%lx", mpidr_to_cpu(mpidr) == 0, 0,
> > mpidr);
> > cpumask_set_cpu(0, &smp_reported);
> > while (!cpumask_full(&smp_reported))
> > cpu_relax();
> > diff --git a/lib/arm/asm/processor.h b/lib/arm/asm/processor.h
> > index f25e7eee3666c..d2048f5f5f7e6 100644
> > --- a/lib/arm/asm/processor.h
> > +++ b/lib/arm/asm/processor.h
> > @@ -40,8 +40,13 @@ static inline unsigned int get_mpidr(void)
> > return mpidr;
> > }
> >
> > -/* Only support Aff0 for now, up to 4 cpus */
> > -#define mpidr_to_cpu(mpidr) ((int)((mpidr) & 0xff))
> > +#define MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK 0xffffff
> > +extern int mpidr_to_cpu(unsigned long mpidr);
> > +
> > +#define MPIDR_LEVEL_SHIFT(level) \
> > + (((1 << level) >> 1) << 3)
> can't we have level << 3?
> > +#define MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, level) \
> > + ((mpidr >> MPIDR_LEVEL_SHIFT(level)) & 0xff)
> >
> > extern void start_usr(void (*func)(void *arg), void *arg, unsigned long
> > sp_usr);
> > extern bool is_user(void);
> > diff --git a/lib/arm/asm/setup.h b/lib/arm/asm/setup.h
> > index cb8fdbd38dd5d..c501c6ddd8657 100644
> > --- a/lib/arm/asm/setup.h
> > +++ b/lib/arm/asm/setup.h
> > @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@
> > #include <asm/page.h>
> > #include <asm/pgtable-hwdef.h>
> >
> > -#define NR_CPUS 8
> > -extern u32 cpus[NR_CPUS];
> > +#define NR_CPUS 255
> 256?
The kernel defines KVM_MAX_VCPUS as VGIC_V3_MAX_CPUS, which is
currently defined as 255. I was just being consistent.
> > +extern u64 cpus[NR_CPUS];
> maybe worth commenting the semantic of cpus[i]?
sure
> > extern int nr_cpus;
> what about MAX_CPUS instead of NR_CPUS?
kernel uses NR_CPUS, I want to be consistent.
> >
> > #define NR_MEM_REGIONS 8
> > diff --git a/lib/arm/setup.c b/lib/arm/setup.c
> > index 7e7b39f11dde1..b6e2d5815e723 100644
> > --- a/lib/arm/setup.c
> > +++ b/lib/arm/setup.c
> > @@ -24,12 +24,22 @@ extern unsigned long stacktop;
> > extern void io_init(void);
> > extern void setup_args_progname(const char *args);
> >
> > -u32 cpus[NR_CPUS] = { [0 ... NR_CPUS-1] = (~0U) };
> > +u64 cpus[NR_CPUS] = { [0 ... NR_CPUS-1] = (~0U) };
> > int nr_cpus;
> >
> > struct mem_region mem_regions[NR_MEM_REGIONS];
> > phys_addr_t __phys_offset, __phys_end;
> >
> > +int mpidr_to_cpu(unsigned long mpidr)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; ++i)
> > + if (cpus[i] == (mpidr & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK))
> > + return i;
> > + return -1;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void cpu_set(int fdtnode __unused, u32 regval, void *info __unused)
> > {
> > int cpu = nr_cpus++;
> > diff --git a/lib/arm64/asm/processor.h b/lib/arm64/asm/processor.h
> > index 9a208ff729b7e..7e448dc81a6aa 100644
> > --- a/lib/arm64/asm/processor.h
> > +++ b/lib/arm64/asm/processor.h
> > @@ -78,8 +78,13 @@ static inline type get_##reg(void)
> > \
> >
> > DEFINE_GET_SYSREG64(mpidr)
> >
> > -/* Only support Aff0 for now, gicv2 only */
> > -#define mpidr_to_cpu(mpidr) ((int)((mpidr) & 0xff))
> > +#define MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK 0xff00ffffff
> > +extern int mpidr_to_cpu(unsigned long mpidr);
> > +
> > +#define MPIDR_LEVEL_SHIFT(level) \
> > + (((1 << level) >> 1) << 3)
> what about level 3? the macro would fail fetching affinity level 3.
>
> Thanks
>
> Eric
> > +#define MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, level) \
> > + ((mpidr >> MPIDR_LEVEL_SHIFT(level)) & 0xff)
> >
> > extern void start_usr(void (*func)(void *arg), void *arg, unsigned long
> > sp_usr);
> > extern bool is_user(void);
> >
>
Thanks,
drew
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 03/10] arm/arm64: smp: support more than 8 cpus,
Andrew Jones <=