qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v2 23/24] numa: add '-numa cpu, ...' option for pr


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v2 23/24] numa: add '-numa cpu, ...' option for property based node mapping
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 15:40:04 +1000
User-agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23)

On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 02:57:17PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> legacy cpu to node mapping is using cpu index values to map
> VCPU to node with help of '-numa node,nodeid=node,cpus=x[-y]'
> option. However cpu index is internal concept and QEMU users
> have to guess /reimplement qemu's logic/ to map it to
> a concrete cpu socket/core/thread to make sane CPUs
> placement across numa nodes.
> 
> This patch allows to map cpu objects to numa nodes using
> the same properties as used for cpus with -device/device_add
> (socket-id/core-id/thread-id/node-id).
> 
> At present valid properties/values to address CPUs could be
> fetched using hotpluggable-cpus monitor/qmp command, it will
> require user to start qemu twice when creating domain to fetch
> possible CPUs for a machine type/-smp layout first and
> then the second time with numa explicit mapping for actual
> usage. The first step results could be saved and reused to
> set/change mapping later as far as machine type/-smp stays
> the same.
> 
> Proposed impl. supports exact and wildcard matching to
> simplify CLI and allow to set mapping for a specific cpu
> or group of cpu objects specified by matched properties.
> 
> For example:
> 
>    # exact mapping x86
>    -numa cpu,node-id=x,socket-id=y,core-id=z,thread-id=n
> 
>    # exact mapping SPAPR
>    -numa cpu,node-id=x,core-id=y
> 
>    # wildcard mapping, all cpu objects that match socket-id=y
>    # are mapped to node-id=x
>    -numa cpu,node-id=x,socket-id=y
> 
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> ---
> v2:
>   - use new NumaCpuOptions instead of CpuInstanceProperties in
>     NumaOptions, so that in future we could decouple both
>     if needed. (Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>)
>   - clarify effect of NumaCpuOptions.node-id in qapi-schema.json
> ---
>  numa.c           | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  qapi-schema.json | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
>  qemu-options.hx  | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/numa.c b/numa.c
> index 40e9f44..61521f5 100644
> --- a/numa.c
> +++ b/numa.c
> @@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ static int parse_numa(void *opaque, QemuOpts *opts, Error 
> **errp)
>      NumaOptions *object = NULL;
>      MachineState *ms = opaque;
>      Error *err = NULL;
> +    CpuInstanceProperties cpu;
>  
>      {
>          Visitor *v = opts_visitor_new(opts);
> @@ -246,6 +247,30 @@ static int parse_numa(void *opaque, QemuOpts *opts, 
> Error **errp)
>          }
>          nb_numa_nodes++;
>          break;
> +    case NUMA_OPTIONS_TYPE_CPU:
> +        if (!object->u.cpu.has_node_id) {
> +            error_setg(&err, "Missing mandatory node-id property");
> +            goto end;
> +        }
> +        if (!numa_info[object->u.cpu.node_id].present) {
> +            error_setg(&err, "Invalid node-id=%" PRId64 ", NUMA node must be 
> "
> +                "defined with -numa node,nodeid=ID before it's used with "
> +                "-numa cpu,node-id=ID", object->u.cpu.node_id);
> +            goto end;
> +        }
> +
> +        memset(&cpu, 0, sizeof(cpu));
> +        cpu.has_node_id = object->u.cpu.has_node_id;
> +        cpu.node_id = object->u.cpu.node_id;
> +        cpu.has_socket_id = object->u.cpu.has_socket_id;
> +        cpu.socket_id = object->u.cpu.socket_id;
> +        cpu.has_core_id = object->u.cpu.has_core_id;
> +        cpu.core_id = object->u.cpu.core_id;
> +        cpu.has_thread_id = object->u.cpu.has_thread_id;
> +        cpu.thread_id = object->u.cpu.thread_id;
> +
> +        machine_set_cpu_numa_node(ms, &cpu, &err);

It's possible I've confused myself by not looking at this whole series
at once.

But, would it be possible to make a single machine hook which maps a
constructed cpu property set to a "canonical" cpu property set from
the table of CPU slots (or errors, of course).  That would let you do
what you need here, and I suspect in other places, without multiple
hooks.

> +        break;
>      default:
>          abort();
>      }
> diff --git a/qapi-schema.json b/qapi-schema.json
> index 76d137d..5baf3a4 100644
> --- a/qapi-schema.json
> +++ b/qapi-schema.json
> @@ -5680,10 +5680,12 @@
>  ##
>  # @NumaOptionsType:
>  #
> +# @cpu: property based CPU(s) to node mapping (Since: 2.10)
> +#
>  # Since: 2.1
>  ##
>  { 'enum': 'NumaOptionsType',
> -  'data': [ 'node' ] }
> +  'data': [ 'node', 'cpu' ] }
>  
>  ##
>  # @NumaOptions:
> @@ -5696,7 +5698,8 @@
>    'base': { 'type': 'NumaOptionsType' },
>    'discriminator': 'type',
>    'data': {
> -    'node': 'NumaNodeOptions' }}
> +    'node': 'NumaNodeOptions',
> +    'cpu': 'NumaCpuOptions' }}
>  
>  ##
>  # @NumaNodeOptions:
> @@ -5725,6 +5728,20 @@
>     '*memdev': 'str' }}
>  
>  ##
> +# @NumaCpuOptions:
> +#
> +# Option "-numa cpu" overrides default cpu to node mapping.
> +# It accepts the same set of cpu properties as returned by
> +# query-hotpluggable-cpus[].props, where node-id could be used to
> +# override default node mapping.
> +#
> +# Since: 2.10
> +##
> +{ 'struct': 'NumaCpuOptions',
> +   'base': 'CpuInstanceProperties',
> +   'data' : {} }
> +
> +##
>  # @HostMemPolicy:
>  #
>  # Host memory policy types
> diff --git a/qemu-options.hx b/qemu-options.hx
> index 787b9c3..e88f534 100644
> --- a/qemu-options.hx
> +++ b/qemu-options.hx
> @@ -139,13 +139,16 @@ ETEXI
>  
>  DEF("numa", HAS_ARG, QEMU_OPTION_numa,
>      "-numa node[,mem=size][,cpus=firstcpu[-lastcpu]][,nodeid=node]\n"
> -    "-numa node[,memdev=id][,cpus=firstcpu[-lastcpu]][,nodeid=node]\n", 
> QEMU_ARCH_ALL)
> +    "-numa node[,memdev=id][,cpus=firstcpu[-lastcpu]][,nodeid=node]\n"
> +    "-numa cpu,node-id=node[,socket-id=x][,core-id=y][,thread-id=z]\n", 
> QEMU_ARCH_ALL)
>  STEXI
>  @item -numa 
> node[,address@hidden,address@hidden@var{lastcpu}]][,address@hidden
>  @itemx -numa 
> node[,address@hidden,address@hidden@var{lastcpu}]][,address@hidden
> address@hidden -numa 
> cpu,address@hidden,address@hidden,address@hidden,address@hidden
>  @findex -numa
>  Define a NUMA node and assign RAM and VCPUs to it.
>  
> +Legacy VCPU assignment uses @samp{cpus} option where
>  @var{firstcpu} and @var{lastcpu} are CPU indexes. Each
>  @samp{cpus} option represent a contiguous range of CPU indexes
>  (or a single VCPU if @var{lastcpu} is omitted). A non-contiguous
> @@ -159,6 +162,24 @@ a NUMA node:
>  -numa node,cpus=0-2,cpus=5
>  @end example
>  
> address@hidden option is a new alternative to @samp{cpus} option
> +which uses @samp{socket-id|core-id|thread-id} properties to assign
> +CPU objects to a @var{node} using topology layout properties of CPU.
> +The set of properties is machine specific, and depends on used
> +machine type/@samp{smp} options. It could be queried with
> address@hidden monitor command.
> address@hidden property specifies @var{node} to which CPU object
> +will be assigned, it's required for @var{node} to be declared
> +with @samp{node} option before it's used with @samp{cpu} option.
> +
> +For example:
> address@hidden
> +-M pc \
> +-smp 1,sockets=2,maxcpus=2 \
> +-numa node,nodeid=0 -numa node,nodeid=1 \
> +-numa cpu,node-id=0,socket-id=0 -numa cpu,node-id=1,socket-id=1
> address@hidden example
> +
>  @samp{mem} assigns a given RAM amount to a node. @samp{memdev}
>  assigns RAM from a given memory backend device to a node. If
>  @samp{mem} and @samp{memdev} are omitted in all nodes, RAM is

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]