qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] target/arm/helper: document potential CNTV regist


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] target/arm/helper: document potential CNTV register bear trap
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 13:34:42 +0100

On 22 June 2017 at 12:18, Alex Bennée <address@hidden> wrote:
> The ARM KVM encodings have been inadvertently switched for
> CNTV_CVAL_EL0/CNTVCT_EL0 in the register API since its introduction.
> Fortunately this doesn't currently mater as the reset values for both
> are the same. However if this ever changes things will break in
> interesting ways.

Augh.

> Migration is currently unaffected as we just use
> cpu->cpreg_vmstate_indexes/cpreg_vmstate_values verbatim. However this
> would break if we ever supported migration between KVM and TCG models.
>
> For now we just warn future generations who may touch this code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>
> Cc: Andre Przywara <address@hidden>
> Cc: Christoffer Dall <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target/arm/helper.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
> index 2594faa9b8..e7a0e39583 100644
> --- a/target/arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target/arm/helper.c
> @@ -211,6 +211,11 @@ static bool raw_accessors_invalid(const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
>      return true;
>  }
>
> +/*
> + * FIXME: the KVM API has switched encodings for
> + * CNTV_CVAL_EL0/CNTVCT_EL0 which need to be fixed if we want to
> + * change the reset values or support KVM<->TCG migration.
> + */

I don't really like just peppering the code with FIXMEs like this.
How much work would it be to determine what the actual required fix
is (whether kernel side or QEMU side) and implement it?

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]