qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-arm] [PATCH 13/15] target/arm: Create and use new function arm_v7m


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH 13/15] target/arm: Create and use new function arm_v7m_is_handler_mode()
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 17:43:59 +0100

Add a utility function for testing whether the CPU is in Handler
mode; this is just a check whether v7m.exception is non-zero, but
we do it in several places and it makes the code a bit easier
to read to not have to mentally figure out what the test is testing.

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
---
 target/arm/cpu.h    | 10 ++++++++--
 target/arm/helper.c |  8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index da90b7a..a3b4b78 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -1630,13 +1630,19 @@ static inline int arm_highest_el(CPUARMState *env)
     return 1;
 }
 
+/* Return true if a v7M CPU is in Handler mode */
+static inline bool arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(CPUARMState *env)
+{
+    return env->v7m.exception != 0;
+}
+
 /* Return the current Exception Level (as per ARMv8; note that this differs
  * from the ARMv7 Privilege Level).
  */
 static inline int arm_current_el(CPUARMState *env)
 {
     if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_M)) {
-        return !((env->v7m.exception == 0) && (env->v7m.control & 1));
+        return arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env) || !(env->v7m.control & 1);
     }
 
     if (is_a64(env)) {
@@ -2636,7 +2642,7 @@ static inline void cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(CPUARMState *env, 
target_ulong *pc,
     }
     *flags |= fp_exception_el(env) << ARM_TBFLAG_FPEXC_EL_SHIFT;
 
-    if (env->v7m.exception != 0) {
+    if (arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env)) {
         *flags |= ARM_TBFLAG_HANDLER_MASK;
     }
 
diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index 0ecc8f1..7920153 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -6147,7 +6147,7 @@ static void do_v7m_exception_exit(ARMCPU *cpu)
      * that jumps to magic addresses don't have magic behaviour unless
      * we're in Handler mode (compare pseudocode BXWritePC()).
      */
-    assert(env->v7m.exception != 0);
+    assert(arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env));
 
     /* In the spec pseudocode ExceptionReturn() is called directly
      * from BXWritePC() and gets the full target PC value including
@@ -6254,7 +6254,7 @@ static void do_v7m_exception_exit(ARMCPU *cpu)
      * resuming in Thread mode. If that doesn't match what the
      * exception return type specified then this is a UsageFault.
      */
-    if (return_to_handler == (env->v7m.exception == 0)) {
+    if (return_to_handler != arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env)) {
         /* Take an INVPC UsageFault by pushing the stack again. */
         armv7m_nvic_set_pending(env->nvic, ARMV7M_EXCP_USAGE);
         env->v7m.cfsr |= R_V7M_CFSR_INVPC_MASK;
@@ -6405,7 +6405,7 @@ void arm_v7m_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
     if (env->v7m.control & R_V7M_CONTROL_SPSEL_MASK) {
         lr |= 4;
     }
-    if (env->v7m.exception == 0) {
+    if (!arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env)) {
         lr |= 8;
     }
 
@@ -8798,7 +8798,7 @@ void HELPER(v7m_msr)(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t maskreg, 
uint32_t val)
          * switch_v7m_sp() deals with updating the SPSEL bit in
          * env->v7m.control, so we only need update the others.
          */
-        if (env->v7m.exception == 0) {
+        if (!arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env)) {
             switch_v7m_sp(env, (val & R_V7M_CONTROL_SPSEL_MASK) != 0);
         }
         env->v7m.control &= ~R_V7M_CONTROL_NPRIV_MASK;
-- 
2.7.4




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]