Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 0/4] vITS Reset

[Christian Borntraeger]

On 11/23/2017 06:44 PM, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Cornelia, Peter,
> 
> On 23/11/17 18:14, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 17:01:32 +0000
>> Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> On 23 November 2017 at 16:05, Auger Eric <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> When using update-linux-headers.sh I get suspicious errors at the end:
>>>> grep: /tmp/tmp.A5NjLtHOij/include/asm/kvm_virtio.h: No such file or
>>>> directory
>>>> sed: can't read /tmp/tmp.A5NjLtHOij/include/asm/kvm_virtio.h: No such
>>>> file or directory
>>>>
>>>> and include/standard-headers/asm-s390/virtio-ccw.h deletedch
>>>>
>>>> I would prefer having s390 people checking and testing that.  
>>>
>>> I think the kvm_virtio.h problem should be fixed by
>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/838230/
>>> which removes it from the set of headers the script imports.
>>>
>>> Cornelia/Christian -- any idea about the virtio-ccw.h issue ?
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> -- PMM
>>
>> I had that commit queued for post-2.11, but I can also send it for 2.11.
>>
>> The virtio-ccw.h one looks weird... if I run the script on my s390-next
>> branch against recent-ish Linux master, I just get the SPDX notice
>> update for virtio-ccw.h.
>>
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/838230/ effectively fixes all issues:
> - no errors anymore and
> - no deletion of include/standard-headers/asm-s390/virtio-ccw.h anymore,
> which is consistent with include/standard-headers/asm-s390/virtio-ccw.h.
> 

I assume the vITS code is post 2.11? If not, we can certainly submit 3 or 4 
s390 patches (including 838230) for 2.11.