qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 32/42] target/arm: Extract HA and HD in aa64_va_parameters


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 32/42] target/arm: Extract HA and HD in aa64_va_parameters
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 10:24:03 +0100

On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 17:42, Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> ---
>  target/arm/internals.h | 2 ++
>  target/arm/helper.c    | 8 +++++++-
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/internals.h b/target/arm/internals.h
> index a50189e2e4..e95b6b1b8f 100644
> --- a/target/arm/internals.h
> +++ b/target/arm/internals.h
> @@ -1014,6 +1014,8 @@ typedef struct ARMVAParameters {
>      bool using64k   : 1;
>      bool tsz_oob    : 1;  /* tsz has been clamped to legal range */
>      bool ds         : 1;
> +    bool ha         : 1;
> +    bool hd         : 1;
>  } ARMVAParameters;
>
>  ARMVAParameters aa64_va_parameters(CPUARMState *env, uint64_t va,
> diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
> index 19a03eb200..70ae3816b9 100644
> --- a/target/arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target/arm/helper.c
> @@ -10280,7 +10280,7 @@ ARMVAParameters aa64_va_parameters(CPUARMState *env, 
> uint64_t va,
>                                     ARMMMUIdx mmu_idx, bool data)
>  {
>      uint64_t tcr = regime_tcr(env, mmu_idx);
> -    bool epd, hpd, using16k, using64k, tsz_oob, ds;
> +    bool epd, hpd, using16k, using64k, tsz_oob, ds, ha, hd;
>      int select, tsz, tbi, max_tsz, min_tsz, ps, sh;
>      ARMCPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env);
>
> @@ -10298,6 +10298,8 @@ ARMVAParameters aa64_va_parameters(CPUARMState *env, 
> uint64_t va,
>          epd = false;
>          sh = extract32(tcr, 12, 2);
>          ps = extract32(tcr, 16, 3);
> +        ha = extract32(tcr, 21, 1) && cpu_isar_feature(aa64_hafs, cpu);
> +        hd = extract32(tcr, 22, 1) && cpu_isar_feature(aa64_hdbs, cpu);
>          ds = extract64(tcr, 32, 1);
>      } else {
>          /*
> @@ -10322,6 +10324,8 @@ ARMVAParameters aa64_va_parameters(CPUARMState *env, 
> uint64_t va,
>              hpd = extract64(tcr, 42, 1);
>          }
>          ps = extract64(tcr, 32, 3);
> +        ha = extract64(tcr, 39, 1) && cpu_isar_feature(aa64_hafs, cpu);
> +        hd = extract64(tcr, 40, 1) && cpu_isar_feature(aa64_hdbs, cpu);
>          ds = extract64(tcr, 59, 1);
>      }
>
> @@ -10393,6 +10397,8 @@ ARMVAParameters aa64_va_parameters(CPUARMState *env, 
> uint64_t va,
>          .using64k = using64k,
>          .tsz_oob = tsz_oob,
>          .ds = ds,
> +        .ha = ha,
> +        .hd = ha & hd,

This is a bitwise operation on two bools, should be && ?

Otherwise
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]