Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH 00/17] block: transactionless incremental backup series

[John Snow]

On 02/27/2015 06:58 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 02/27/2015 04:47 PM, John Snow wrote:
> > New topic, new version, same great incremental backup taste.
>
> Hmm, I haven't subscribed to the new qemu-block list yet (which I'm
> about to rectify), but this raises a question: should patches to this
> list also be mirrored over to the main qemu-devel, so that someone
> willing to drink from the firehouse need only subscribe to one list to
> see all patches (filtering rules still make it handy to highlight which
> patches cc'd qemu-block)?  Or are we admitting that block-related
> patches might NOT be on the main list because they are sent only here?

Mistake on my part. I made a new git-publish profile, but the CC setting 
for qemu-devel didn't seem to stick.

Patches should continue to be sent to qemu-devel AND qemu-block. 
Qemu-block will just be a convenient filtering mechanism going forward, 
so far as I understand it. It is entirely possible that non-patch 
messages may go unmirrored, though.

I will issue a RESEND of this series without including any CCs or 
bumping the version to just qemu-devel.

--js