qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH 10/25] nbd: Fix potential signed overflow issues


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH 10/25] nbd: Fix potential signed overflow issues
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:28:54 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0


On 25/02/2015 19:08, Max Reitz wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <address@hidden>
> ---
>  include/block/nbd.h | 4 ++--
>  qemu-nbd.c          | 5 +++--
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/block/nbd.h b/include/block/nbd.h
> index 2c20138..53726e8 100644
> --- a/include/block/nbd.h
> +++ b/include/block/nbd.h
> @@ -54,8 +54,8 @@ struct nbd_reply {
>  /* Reply types. */
>  #define NBD_REP_ACK             (1)             /* Data sending finished. */
>  #define NBD_REP_SERVER          (2)             /* Export description. */
> -#define NBD_REP_ERR_UNSUP       ((1 << 31) | 1) /* Unknown option. */
> -#define NBD_REP_ERR_INVALID     ((1 << 31) | 3) /* Invalid length. */
> +#define NBD_REP_ERR_UNSUP       ((UINT32_C(1) << 31) | 1) /* Unknown option. 
> */
> +#define NBD_REP_ERR_INVALID     ((UINT32_C(1) << 31) | 3) /* Invalid length. 
> */

Easier to just use 0x80000001u and 0x80000003u; changed locally.

>  
>  #define NBD_CMD_MASK_COMMAND 0x0000ffff
>  #define NBD_CMD_FLAG_FUA     (1 << 16)
> diff --git a/qemu-nbd.c b/qemu-nbd.c
> index c9ed003..fd1e0c8 100644
> --- a/qemu-nbd.c
> +++ b/qemu-nbd.c
> @@ -142,8 +142,9 @@ static void read_partition(uint8_t *p, struct 
> partition_record *r)
>      r->end_head = p[5];
>      r->end_cylinder = p[7] | ((p[6] << 2) & 0x300);
>      r->end_sector = p[6] & 0x3f;
> -    r->start_sector_abs = p[8] | p[9] << 8 | p[10] << 16 | p[11] << 24;
> -    r->nb_sectors_abs = p[12] | p[13] << 8 | p[14] << 16 | p[15] << 24;
> +
> +    r->start_sector_abs = le32_to_cpup((uint32_t *)(p +  8));
> +    r->nb_sectors_abs   = le32_to_cpup((uint32_t *)(p + 12));

By accepting uint32_t*, le32_to_cpup  is not safe if p is not properly
aligned.  ldl_le_p is better in this case.

Paolo

>  }
>  
>  static int find_partition(BlockBackend *blk, int partition,
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]