qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH v5 0/2] block: enforce minimal 4096 alignment in


From: Dmitry Monakhov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH v5 0/2] block: enforce minimal 4096 alignment in qemu_blockalign
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 14:16:32 +0300
User-agent: Notmuch/0.18.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)

Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> writes:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
>
>
> On 01/06/2015 12:34, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
>> Yes. Improvement is not huge, but it can be detected for old qemu 
>> unpatched kernel: 728 MiB/sec ± 20Mb patched kernel  : 748 MiB/sec
>> ± 10Mb
>
> Ok, so about 3-4%.  What does the blktrace look like with a patched
> kernel, and what is the performance with old QEMU?
new qemu looks perfect
259,0   31       62     0.711100207 10768  D  WS 29364992 + 256 [qemu-io]
259,0   31       63     0.711128098 10768  Q  WS 29365248 + 256 [qemu-io]
259,0   31       64     0.711128509 10768  G  WS 29365248 + 256 [qemu-io]
259,0   31       65     0.711130463 10768  D  WS 29365248 + 256 [qemu-io]
259,0   31       66     0.711134222 10768  C  WS 29364480 + 256 [0]
259,0   31       67     0.711158858 10768  Q  WS 29365504 + 256 [qemu-io]
259,0   31       68     0.711159226 10768  G  WS 29365504 + 256 [qemu-io]
259,0   31       69     0.711161104 10768  D  WS 29365504 + 256 [qemu-io]
259,0   31       70     0.711171863 10768  C  WS 29364736 + 256 [0]

old qemu on patched kernel stil issues two bios Max_sz-1page + 1page, such bios 
are not
merged and completed separately  
259,0   31      385     0.719283423 10729  Q  WS 29376775 + 248 [qemu-io]
259,0   31      386     0.719283694 10729  G  WS 29376775 + 248 [qemu-io]
259,0   31      387     0.719285909 10729  D  WS 29376775 + 248 [qemu-io]
259,0   31      388     0.719287600 10729  Q  WS 29377023 + 8 [qemu-io]
259,0   31      389     0.719287810 10729  G  WS 29377023 + 8 [qemu-io]
259,0   31      390     0.719288666 10729  D  WS 29377023 + 8 [qemu-io]
259,0   31      391     0.719315193 10729  Q  WS 29377031 + 248 [qemu-io]
259,0   31      392     0.719315400 10729  G  WS 29377031 + 248 [qemu-io]
259,0   31      393     0.719317411 10729  D  WS 29377031 + 248 [qemu-io]
259,0   31      394     0.719319179 10729  Q  WS 29377279 + 8 [qemu-io]
259,0   31      395     0.719319366 10729  G  WS 29377279 + 8 [qemu-io]
259,0   31      396     0.719320014 10729  D  WS 29377279 + 8 [qemu-io]
.....
259,0   31      916     0.722132787 10729  C  WS 29377031 + 248 [0]
....
259,0   31      995     0.722549469 10729  C  WS 29376775 + 248 [0]
....
259,0   31     4260     0.748148953 10729  C  WS 29377023 + 8 [0]
.....
259,0   31     4274     0.748217568 10729  C  WS 29377279 + 8 [0]
I'm not quite sure why each bio dispatched to device that soon, AFAIU 
plug/unplug
scope whole do_direct_IO() loop, So bio it looks like bio submit to request
path should be modified.
>
> Paolo
>
>> IMHO patch is not sufficient. We have to correct bio construction
>> inside direct-io code. I'll be back with the patch.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]