|
From: | Max Reitz |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH v3 38/38] iotests: Add test for change-related QMP commands |
Date: | Fri, 05 Jun 2015 17:08:54 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 |
On 03.06.2015 23:46, Eric Blake wrote:
On 06/03/2015 01:44 PM, Max Reitz wrote:Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <address@hidden> --- tests/qemu-iotests/118 | 638 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tests/qemu-iotests/118.out | 5 + tests/qemu-iotests/group | 1 + 3 files changed, 644 insertions(+) create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/118 create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/118.out + def test_tray_open_change(self): + result = self.vm.qmp('blockdev-open-tray', device='drive0', force=True) + self.assert_qmp(result, 'return', {}) + + self.wait_for_open() + + result = self.vm.qmp('query-block') + self.assert_qmp(result, 'return[0]/tray_open', True) + if self.was_empty == True:Stylistically, isn't 'if self.was_empty:' equivalent? But I'm no python guru, so I can live with the test as you have it.
I don't know. :-)Probably, it's a bit different (in that if self.was_empty was not a boolean), but for this case it would be the same. Assuming it works, that is. I'll just leave it like this to be sure.
+++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/group @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ 114 rw auto quick 115 rw auto 116 rw auto quick +118 rw auto 121 rw autoWow - we've got several placeholders pending review :)
Indeed, I still think we do need some kind of list where we can keep track of which test is "taken" by which series...
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
As always, thank you! Max
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |