Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] block: driver should override flags in bdrv_open()

[Stefan Hajnoczi]

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 06/09/2015 04:19 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 10:59:42AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Am 09.06.2015 um 10:41 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
>>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Max Reitz <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>> BDRV_O_PROTOCOL is an internal qemu flag which a user should be able to
>>>>> override by explicitly specifying a block driver. This series implements
>>>>> this and adds two iotests (one for NBD, one for file) to test it.
>>>>>
>
>>>> Please resend and CC Kevin (for qemu-iotests and block.c).
>>>
>>> It's only you who dropped me from CC. :-)
>>
>> For sanity, can you check whether you are on the CC list in Max's second
>> ping message: address@hidden
>>
>> I had another CC mix-up recently and want to check whether my mail tools
>> are dropping CCs or if it's just me being confused.
>
> mailman has an (extremely annoying, in my opinion) habit of munging cc:
> lines to drop the name of any recipient who has set their list delivery
> options to avoid duplicate messages where the recipient is in cc.
> Ultimately, the end user still gets the messages (reply-to-all gets the
> message back to the list, even though it drops the cc), but at the
> expense of not directly going to the inbox as desired.  At least I still
> only get one copy of the message, but yes, I'd rather have that one copy
> come directly to me for all messages in the thread, rather than through
> the list because I was munged out of cc.
>
> I hope that mailman3/hyperkitty will have saner defaults and not munge
> cc lists to exclude subscribers merely based on their preference on
> duplicate mail receipt.

Wow!  You are right:

I checked my @redhat.com inbox and I see address@hidden has
Kevin in CC.

I checked my @gmail.com inbox (subscribed to mailing list) and I see
address@hidden does not have Kevin in CC.

I guess my @redhat.com email was received directly from Max because I
was in CC list.  It didn't pass through Mailman.  I saw the original,
unmodified list of CCs with Kevin included.

The @gmail.com email was received from the mailing list.  Mailman did
what you described.

This means I cannot send "Please CC maintainer" emails anymore because
I cannot be sure whether the maintainer was CCed!

Stefan